Suppr超能文献

非裔美国人的孕期时长:一种新预测规则的验证

Length of pregnancy in African Americans: validation of a new predictive rule.

作者信息

Mittendorf R, Chorzempa L M, Quinlan M P, Herschel M, Williams M A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Med Assoc. 1999 Sep;91(9):523-7.

Abstract

This study evaluated whether a new predictive rule is more accurate for estimating the length of pregnancy in African Americans than Nägele's rule, the accepted standard. After identifying women in early pregnancy, telephone interviews were conducted to obtain information about 16 previously established determinants of gestational length. Based on these data, a linear multivariate regression model was used to predict an estimated delivery date (EDD) for each mother. In addition, the EDD was determined using Nägele's rule. Later, the actual delivery date was compared with the EDD predicted by the new rule and with the EDD predicted by Nägele's rule. Each pregnancy was assigned to its better prediction group, either the new rule's group or the Nägele's rule group. Fifty-seven pregnancies were identified prospectively and monitored. The new rule predicted the actual delivery date more accurately in 66% (37/56) of pregnancies, Nägele's rule was a better predictor in 34% (19/56) of pregnancies, and both rules were equally accurate in predicting the delivery date for one pregnancy. The new rule was more precise than Nägele's rule (P = .022) when the binomial distribution was used. When using the linear regression model rule, a more accurate EDD can be determined for African-American women. Moreover, it is possible to predict the risk of preterm delivery (those occurring > 3 weeks earlier than the EDD).

摘要

本研究评估了一种新的预测规则在估算非裔美国女性孕期长度方面是否比公认标准——纳格尔法则更准确。在确定早孕女性后,通过电话访谈获取了有关16个先前确定的孕期长度决定因素的信息。基于这些数据,使用线性多变量回归模型为每位母亲预测预计分娩日期(EDD)。此外,使用纳格尔法则确定预计分娩日期。之后,将实际分娩日期与新规则预测得到的预计分娩日期以及纳格尔法则预测得到的预计分娩日期进行比较。每次怀孕都被归入其预测效果更好的组,即新规则组或纳格尔法则组。前瞻性地确定并监测了57例怀孕情况。新规则在66%(37/56)的怀孕案例中更准确地预测了实际分娩日期,纳格尔法则在34%(19/56)的怀孕案例中是更好的预测指标,并且在预测一例怀孕的分娩日期时,两种规则同样准确。当使用二项分布时,新规则比纳格尔法则更精确(P = 0.022)。使用线性回归模型规则时,可以为非裔美国女性确定更准确的预计分娩日期。此外,还能够预测早产风险(那些比预计分娩日期早3周以上发生的情况)。

相似文献

2
Naegele's rule revisited.重新审视奈格尔法则。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2016 Jun;8:100-1. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
9
How well do midwives estimate the date of delivery?
Midwifery. 2003 Jun;19(2):125-31. doi: 10.1016/s0266-6138(02)00108-0.
10
Fetal size and growth.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Apr;5(2):186-94.

本文引用的文献

1
[On the gestation period post ovulation].
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1962 Oct;22:1191-4.
2
Predictors of human gestational length.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Feb;168(2):480-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90476-y.
3
Differences in duration of pregnancy. Negro and white women of low socioeconomic class.
Arch Environ Health. 1967 Jun;14(6):904-11. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1967.10664859.
4
Time of ovulation and prolonged pregnancy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972 Jan 1;112(1):31-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90525-x.
6
The length of uncomplicated human gestation.
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jun;75(6):929-32.
7
Can we abandon Naegele's rule?我们可以摒弃内格莱法则吗?
Lancet. 1991 Mar 9;337(8741):600-1. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91653-c.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验