Zhou R, Wang Y, Gruber A, Larsson R, Castaños-Vèlez E, Liliemark E
Department of Oncology-Pathology at Radiumhemmet , Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden.
Med Oncol. 1999 Sep;16(3):191-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02906131.
In order to further elucidate the roles of DNA topoisomerase II (topo II) subtypes, alpha and beta, as drug targets in chemotherapy, we have determined the enzyme levels in K562 cells selected for resistance to mitoxantrone (K562/Mxn), daunorubicin (K562/Dnr) and idarubicin (K562/Ida 20 and K562/Ida 60), as well as topo II-DNA complex formation, DNA damage and cytotoxicity, induced by topo II interactive agents, for example etoposide, teniposide, mitoxantrone and amsacrine. As compared to the parental cells, topo IIalpha/beta protein levels in K562/Mxn, K562/Dnr, K562/Ida 20 and 60 lines, measured with Western blot, were 17/67%, 85/88, 24/31% and 10/7% respectively. DNA damage, determined by DNA unwinding technique, induced by teniposide and amsacrine correlated with both topo IIalpha/beta protein levels (r2 = 0.8/0.9, P = 0.03/0.01 and r2 = 0.8/0.9, P = 0.04/0.01, respectively). Topo II-DNA complex formation induced by all studied drugs correlated with topo IIbeta protein levels (r2-range 0.8-0.9, P-range 0.01-0.04), while the correlation with topo IIalpha was weaker. Topo IIalpha/beta protein levels tended to show an inverse correlation with the cytotoxicity of etoposide (r2 = -0.9/-0.7, P = 0.01/0.06). The overall topo II-DNA complex formation correlated with drug-induced DNA damage (r2 = 0.9, P = 0.0001), whilst not with the cytotoxicity. Our findings indicate that both topo II isozymes are the targets of the antitumor agents studied, and of potential clinical relevance for prediction of treatment efficacy. They could play a role in tailored chemotherapy.
为了进一步阐明DNA拓扑异构酶II(拓扑异构酶II)的α和β亚型作为化疗药物靶点的作用,我们测定了对米托蒽醌(K562/Mxn)、柔红霉素(K562/Dnr)和伊达比星(K562/Ida 20和K562/Ida 60)耐药的K562细胞中的酶水平,以及拓扑异构酶II相互作用剂(如依托泊苷、替尼泊苷、米托蒽醌和安吖啶)诱导的拓扑异构酶II-DNA复合物形成、DNA损伤和细胞毒性。与亲本细胞相比,用蛋白质印迹法测定的K562/Mxn、K562/Dnr、K562/Ida 20和60细胞系中的拓扑异构酶IIα/β蛋白水平分别为17/67%、85/88、24/31%和10/7%。用DNA解旋技术测定的替尼泊苷和安吖啶诱导的DNA损伤与拓扑异构酶IIα/β蛋白水平均相关(r2分别为0.8/0.9,P = 0.03/0.01和r2为0.8/0.9,P = 0.04/0.01)。所有研究药物诱导的拓扑异构酶II-DNA复合物形成与拓扑异构酶IIβ蛋白水平相关(r2范围为0.8 - 0.9,P范围为0.01 - 0.04),而与拓扑异构酶IIα的相关性较弱。拓扑异构酶IIα/β蛋白水平倾向于与依托泊苷的细胞毒性呈负相关(r2 = -0.9/-0.7,P = 0.01/0.06)。总体拓扑异构酶II-DNA复合物形成与药物诱导的DNA损伤相关(r^2 = 0.9,P = 0.0001),而与细胞毒性无关。我们的研究结果表明,两种拓扑异构酶II同工酶都是所研究的抗肿瘤药物的靶点,对预测治疗效果具有潜在的临床意义。它们可能在个体化化疗中发挥作用。