Lok S S
North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999 Sep;18(9):884-90. doi: 10.1016/s1053-2498(99)00050-9.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has a relatively poor prognosis with limited therapeutic intervention. This has led to varying practices, from a nihilistic approach at one end to more aggressive management at the other. However, a dedicated clinic with a multidisciplinary approach may offer advantages to patients with IPF.
A retrospective observational study was performed to compare patients with a diagnosis of IPF attending a general respiratory clinic between January 1988 and December 1996 to those attending a interstitial lung disease (ILD) clinic between January 1992 and December 1996. The notes were reviewed for (1) confirmation of diagnosis, (2) method of diagnosis, (3) date of initial consultation, and (4) survival. The end point was death, and the number of deaths that occurred up to October 1997 was recorded.
The study identified 148 patients with a diagnosis of IPF. Ten patients underwent transplantation and were excluded. Of the remaining 138, 84 patients attended the general respiratory clinic (mean age 65 years: 53 men [63%], 31 women), and 54 attended the ILD clinic (mean age 56 years: 26 men [48%], 28 women). Patients attending the ILD clinic had a median survival of >3714 days. Patients attending the general respiratory clinic had a median survival of 1796 +/- standard error 437 days (CI 940-2652), p = .032 Breslow. Age was an important determinant of outcome. For patients less than 60 years of age (n = 60), the median survival for the ILD clinic was >3700 days, compared to 2535 +/- 577 days (CI 1404-280) in the general respiratory clinic, p = .037 Breslow. There was no difference in survival of patients over 60 years of age.
The study suggests that a dedicated multidisciplinary clinic may result in an improved outcome for patients with IPF, particularly for patients younger than 60 years. This has implications that may facilitate the development of suitably powered therapeutic trials and may affect patient referral for transplantation.
特发性肺纤维化(IPF)预后相对较差,治疗干预有限。这导致了从一端的虚无主义方法到另一端更积极管理的不同做法。然而,采用多学科方法的专门诊所可能会给IPF患者带来益处。
进行了一项回顾性观察研究,以比较1988年1月至1996年12月在普通呼吸科诊所就诊的IPF诊断患者与1992年1月至1996年12月在间质性肺病(ILD)诊所就诊的患者。对病历进行审查,内容包括:(1)诊断确认,(2)诊断方法,(3)首次咨询日期,以及(4)生存率。终点为死亡,并记录截至1997年10月发生的死亡人数。
该研究确定了148例IPF诊断患者。10例患者接受了移植并被排除。其余138例中,84例患者在普通呼吸科诊所就诊(平均年龄65岁:男性53例[63%],女性31例),54例在ILD诊所就诊(平均年龄56岁:男性26例[48%],女性28例)。在ILD诊所就诊的患者中位生存期>3714天。在普通呼吸科诊所就诊的患者中位生存期为1796±标准误437天(940 - 2652天置信区间),Breslow检验p = 0.032。年龄是结果的重要决定因素。对于年龄小于60岁的患者(n = 60),ILD诊所的中位生存期>3700天,而普通呼吸科诊所为2535±577天(1404 - 280天置信区间),Breslow检验p = 0.037。60岁以上患者的生存率无差异。
该研究表明,专门的多学科诊所可能会改善IPF患者的预后,特别是对于60岁以下的患者。这可能有助于开展有足够效力的治疗试验,并可能影响患者的移植转诊。