Suppr超能文献

快速消除的催眠药所致耐受性和反弹性失眠:睡眠实验室研究的荟萃分析

Tolerance and rebound insomnia with rapidly eliminated hypnotics: a meta-analysis of sleep laboratory studies.

作者信息

Soldatos C R, Dikeos D G, Whitehead A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999 Sep;14(5):287-303.

Abstract

Differences in development of tolerance and occurrence of rebound insomnia have been well established between rapidly and slowly eliminated benzodiazepine hypnotics. Based on meta-analytic methodology, this study assesses whether there are such differences among the rapidly eliminated benzodiazepine and benzodiazepine-like hypnotics (brotizolam, midazolam, triazolam, zolpidem and zopiclone). All sleep laboratory studies of these drugs (n = 137) published from 1966 to 1997 were obtained, mainly through a MEDLINE search. Rigorous selection criteria resulted in the inclusion of 75 studies employing 1276 individuals (804 insomniacs and 472 healthy volunteers). Using a mixed effects regression model, reliable estimation of the effects on insomniacs of the recommended dose of each drug could be obtained. All five rapidly eliminated hypnotics showed statistically significant initial efficacy. Tolerance with intermediate and long-term use was clearly developed with triazolam and was only marginal with midazolam and zolpidem; it could not be estimated for brotizolam or zopiclone because of insufficient data. Rebound insomnia on the first withdrawal night was intense with triazolam and mild with zolpidem; data were unavailable for brotizolam and inadequate for midazolam and zopiclone. In conclusion, there are differences among the rapidly eliminated hypnotics with respect to tolerance and rebound insomnia suggesting that, in addition to short elimination half-life, other pharmacological properties are implicated in the mechanisms underlying these side-effects.

摘要

快速消除和缓慢消除的苯二氮䓬类催眠药在耐受性发展和反弹性失眠发生率方面的差异已得到充分证实。基于荟萃分析方法,本研究评估了快速消除的苯二氮䓬类和苯二氮䓬样催眠药(溴替唑仑、咪达唑仑、三唑仑、唑吡坦和佐匹克隆)之间是否存在此类差异。主要通过医学文献数据库检索,获取了1966年至1997年发表的关于这些药物的所有睡眠实验室研究(n = 137)。严格的选择标准导致纳入了75项研究,涉及1276名个体(804名失眠患者和472名健康志愿者)。使用混合效应回归模型,可以可靠地估计每种药物推荐剂量对失眠患者的影响。所有五种快速消除的催眠药均显示出统计学上显著的初始疗效。三唑仑在中长期使用时明显产生耐受性,而咪达唑仑和唑吡坦仅产生轻微耐受性;由于数据不足,无法估计溴替唑仑或佐匹克隆的耐受性。在首次停药当晚,三唑仑导致的反弹性失眠强烈,唑吡坦导致的反弹性失眠轻微;溴替唑仑的数据不可用,咪达唑仑和佐匹克隆的数据不充分。总之,快速消除的催眠药在耐受性和反弹性失眠方面存在差异,这表明除了消除半衰期短之外,其他药理特性也与这些副作用的潜在机制有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验