Suppr超能文献

扫视抑制先于视觉运动分析。

Saccadic suppression precedes visual motion analysis.

作者信息

Burr D C, Morgan M J, Morrone M C

机构信息

Istituto di Neurofisiologia del CNR Via S. Zeno 51, Pisa, 56127, Italy.

出版信息

Curr Biol. 1999 Oct 21;9(20):1207-9. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80028-7.

Abstract

There is now good evidence that perception of motion is strongly suppressed during saccades (rapid shifts of gaze), presumably to blunt the disturbing sense of motion that saccades would otherwise elicit. Other aspects of vision, such as contrast detection of high-frequency or equiluminant gratings, are virtually unaffected by saccades [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. This has led to the suggestion that saccades may suppress selectively the magnocellular pathway (which is strongly implicated in motion perception), leaving the parvocellular pathway unaffected [5] [6]. Here, we investigate the neural level at which perception of motion is suppressed. We used a simple technique in which an impression of motion is generated from only two frames, allowing precise control over the stimulus [7] [8]. One frame has a certain fixed contrast, whereas the contrast of the other (the test frame) is varied to determine the threshold for motion discrimination (that is, the lowest test-frame contrast level at which the direction of motion can be correctly guessed). Contrast thresholds of the test depended strongly and non-monotonically on the contrast of the fixed-contrast frame, with a minimum at medium contrast. To study the effect of saccadic suppression, we triggered the two-frame sequence by a voluntary saccade. Thresholds during saccades increased in a way that suggested that saccadic suppression precedes motion analysis: when the test frame was first in the motion sequence there was a general depression of sensitivity, whereas when it was second, the contrast response curve was shifted to a higher contrast range, sometimes even resulting in higher sensitivity than without a saccade. The dependence on presentation order suggests that saccadic suppression occurs at an early stage of visual processing, on the single frames themselves rather than on the combined motion signal. As motion detection itself is thought to occur at an early stage, saccadic suppression must take place at a very early phenomenon.

摘要

现在有充分的证据表明,在扫视(快速的目光移动)过程中,运动感知会受到强烈抑制,推测这是为了减弱扫视否则会引发的令人不安的运动感觉。视觉的其他方面,如高频或等亮度光栅的对比度检测,实际上不受扫视的影响[1][2][3][4][5]。这引发了一种观点,即扫视可能选择性地抑制大细胞通路(该通路与运动感知密切相关),而使小细胞通路不受影响[5][6]。在此,我们研究运动感知被抑制的神经层面。我们使用了一种简单的技术,即仅从两帧图像中产生运动印象,从而能够精确控制刺激[7][8]。一帧具有一定的固定对比度,而另一帧(测试帧)的对比度则变化以确定运动辨别阈值(即能够正确猜出运动方向的最低测试帧对比度水平)。测试帧的对比度阈值强烈且非单调地依赖于固定对比度帧的对比度,在中等对比度时达到最小值。为了研究扫视抑制的效果,我们通过自愿扫视触发两帧序列。扫视期间的阈值增加,这表明扫视抑制先于运动分析:当测试帧在运动序列中首先出现时,敏感度普遍下降,而当它在第二个出现时,对比度响应曲线会移至更高的对比度范围,有时甚至导致比无扫视时更高的敏感度。对呈现顺序的依赖表明,扫视抑制发生在视觉处理的早期阶段,作用于单个帧本身而非组合的运动信号。由于运动检测本身被认为发生在早期阶段,所以扫视抑制必定是一个非常早期的现象。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验