Shim Won Mok, Cavanagh Patrick
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Vision Res. 2006 Oct;46(19):3214-22. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 Jun 13.
In this study, we examined the relation between motion induced position shifts and the position shifts caused by saccades. When a stimulus is flashed briefly around the time of a saccade, its perceived position is mislocalized toward the saccade target: if the flash is in front of the saccade the test flash appears shifted in the direction of eye movement; but a test flashed beyond the saccade target is displaced back toward the saccade target (bi-directional saccadic compression: Ross, J., Morrone, M. C., and Burr, D. C. (1997). Compression of visual space before saccades. Nature, 386, 598-601. Motion induced position shifts (in the absence of eye movements) have been demonstrated for a variety of stimuli but the illusory position shift is always found to be in the same direction as the motion. However, all previous studies presented the tests either along or beside the motion path, never beyond its end point. We now test this region beyond the motion path and find that the apparent location of a test in this region is shifted in the direction opposite to the motion, back toward the motion end point. In contrast, when the flash was presented between the beginning and end of the motion path, it is shifted in the direction of motion, again, toward the motion end point. These shifts together indicate a compression of perceived locations toward the end point of the apparent motion. Control experiments confirmed that this effect was neither due to the Fröhlich effect induced by apparent motion from the test flash to the second disc nor to foveal compression. The correspondence between compression toward the end point of apparent motion and saccadic compression toward the saccade target suggests that attentional shifts or planned eye movement signals may play a role in both.
在本研究中,我们考察了运动诱发的位置偏移与扫视引起的位置偏移之间的关系。当在扫视发生前后短暂呈现一个刺激时,其感知位置会朝着扫视目标错误定位:如果闪光在扫视之前出现,测试闪光会朝着眼球运动方向偏移;但在扫视目标之后闪现的测试闪光会朝着扫视目标反向偏移(双向扫视压缩:罗斯,J.,莫罗内,M. C.,和伯尔,D. C.(1997年)。扫视前视觉空间的压缩。《自然》,386,598 - 601)。对于各种刺激,已经证明了运动诱发的位置偏移(在没有眼球运动的情况下),但虚幻的位置偏移总是被发现与运动方向相同。然而,之前所有的研究都是沿着运动路径或在其旁边呈现测试,从未超出其终点。我们现在测试超出运动路径的这个区域,发现该区域中测试刺激的表观位置朝着与运动相反的方向偏移,回到运动终点。相比之下,当闪光在运动路径的起点和终点之间呈现时,它朝着运动方向偏移,同样是朝着运动终点。这些偏移共同表明感知位置朝着表观运动的终点压缩。对照实验证实,这种效应既不是由于测试闪光到第二个圆盘的表观运动诱发的弗罗利希效应,也不是由于中央凹压缩。朝着表观运动终点的压缩与朝着扫视目标的扫视压缩之间的对应关系表明,注意力转移或计划的眼球运动信号可能在两者中都起作用。