Suppr超能文献

非转移性骨盆尤文肉瘤:法国儿科肿瘤学会报告

Nonmetastatic pelvic Ewing sarcoma: report of the French society of pediatric oncology.

作者信息

Carrie C, Mascard E, Gomez F, Habrand J L, Alapetite C, Oberlin O, Moncho V, Hoffstetter S

机构信息

Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Med Pediatr Oncol. 1999 Nov;33(5):444-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-911x(199911)33:5<444::aid-mpo2>3.0.co;2-d.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since January, 1984, 59 children with histologically confirmed Ewing sarcoma of the pelvic bone have been treated with three successive chemotherapy protocols recommended by the French Society of Pediatric Oncology. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the role of surgery and/or radiotherapy in local progression-free, disease-free, and overall survivals (LPFS, DFS, and OS, respectively).

PROCEDURE

We retrospectively examined 59 children treated for nonmetastatic, pelvic Ewing sarcoma over the last 12 years. All were first treated with chemotherapy according to the current French protocol. Six patients developed progressive disease before local treatment and were excluded for local control and survival analysis. Local treatment was surgery alone in 17 cases, radiation therapy in 27 cases, and surgery plus radiation therapy in 9 cases.

RESULTS

With a median of follow-up of 6.5 years, no significant differences in local control or survival were observed with the three chemotherapeutic protocols. Of the 53 patients evaluable for local control, 6 relapsed locally only, 8 had local and distant relapses, and 9 had distant metastases only. The 5-year OS rate was worst for patients with radiotherapy alone compared to those with surgery or combined modality treatment (44 % vs. 72 %, P = 0.043). The 5-year LPFS and DFS rates were worst in the radiotherapy-alone group but not significantly (63% vs. 79%, P = 0. 22 and 42% vs 71%, P =0.07, respectively). The importance of surgery to OS and DFS was confirmed by multivariate analysis (P = 0.026 and P = 0.048, respectively). One surviving patient was diagnosed with in-field fibrosarcoma, which was presumably radiation induced.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite intensive, multiagent chemotherapy, survival from pelvic Ewing sarcoma has not improved over the past decade; however, the survival rate does not seem to be worse than that from Ewing sarcoma at other locations, insofar as at least 50% of the patients were cured. Surgery or a combination of surgery and radiation therapy are the best local treatment; exclusive radiation therapy should be reserved for patients with inoperable lesions or partially or nonchemosensitive tumors or when surgery would be an amputation.

摘要

背景

自1984年1月以来,59例经组织学确诊的骨盆尤因肉瘤患儿接受了法国儿科肿瘤学会推荐的三个连续化疗方案的治疗。本研究的目的是评估手术和/或放疗在局部无进展生存期、无病生存期和总生存期(分别为LPFS、DFS和OS)中的作用。

方法

我们回顾性研究了过去12年中接受非转移性骨盆尤因肉瘤治疗的59例患儿。所有患儿均首先根据当前法国方案接受化疗。6例患儿在局部治疗前出现疾病进展,被排除在局部控制和生存分析之外。局部治疗中,17例仅接受手术,27例接受放疗,9例接受手术加放疗。

结果

中位随访6.5年,三种化疗方案在局部控制或生存方面未观察到显著差异。在可评估局部控制的53例患者中,6例仅局部复发,8例局部和远处复发,9例仅远处转移。与接受手术或综合治疗的患者相比,单纯放疗患者的5年总生存率最差(44%对72%,P = 0.043)。单纯放疗组的5年LPFS和DFS率最差,但差异无统计学意义(分别为63%对79%,P = 0.22和42%对71%,P = 0.07)。多因素分析证实了手术对OS和DFS 的重要性(分别为P = 0.026和P = 0.048)。一名存活患者被诊断为野内纤维肉瘤,可能是放疗所致。

结论

尽管进行了强化多药化疗,但骨盆尤因肉瘤的生存率在过去十年中并未提高;然而,生存率似乎并不比其他部位的尤因肉瘤更差,因为至少50%的患者被治愈。手术或手术与放疗联合是最佳的局部治疗方法;单纯放疗应仅用于无法手术的病变、部分或非化疗敏感肿瘤患者,或手术将导致截肢的情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验