Suppr超能文献

异源双链分析、直接测序和酶切错配裂解用于检测大基因FBN1突变的比较

Comparison of heteroduplex analysis, direct sequencing, and enzyme mismatch cleavage for detecting mutations in a large gene, FBN1.

作者信息

Yuan B, Thomas J P, von Kodolitsch Y, Pyeritz R E

机构信息

Department of Human Genetics, MCP Hahnemann School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Hum Mutat. 1999;14(5):440-6. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(199911)14:5<440::AID-HUMU11>3.0.CO;2-P.

Abstract

Analysis of large genes for mutations of clinical relevance is complicated by intragenic heterogeneity, sensitivity, and cost of the methods available, and in the case of many conditions, specificity of the genetic alterations detected. We examined the FBN1 gene for mutations in people who had Marfan syndrome using three methods: single-chain polymorphism analysis (SSCP) with heteroduplex (HA) analysis, enzyme-mediated cleavage (EMC) of heteroduplexes, and direct sequencing. We also used these methods to search for mutations in the P53 gene in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The results showed that EMC was most efficient for detecting mutations. However, the cost favored SSCP with heteroduplex analysis, provided conditions did not need to be optimized to detect a mutation. Until more cost-effective and sensitive methods are developed to detect unknown mutations in large genes, diagnosis of many genetic disorders will depend on the willingness of an investigator who is studying a particular disorder to perform clinical molecular testing and have the laboratory accredited.

摘要

由于基因内的异质性、现有方法的敏感性和成本,以及在许多情况下所检测到的基因改变的特异性,对具有临床相关性的突变进行大基因分析变得很复杂。我们使用三种方法检测患有马凡综合征的人群中FBN1基因的突变:单链多态性分析(SSCP)结合异源双链(HA)分析、异源双链的酶介导切割(EMC)以及直接测序。我们还使用这些方法在肝细胞癌患者中搜索P53基因的突变。结果表明,EMC在检测突变方面效率最高。然而,在不需要优化条件来检测突变的情况下,成本方面更倾向于SSCP结合异源双链分析。在开发出更具成本效益和敏感性的方法来检测大基因中的未知突变之前,许多遗传疾病的诊断将取决于研究特定疾病的研究者进行临床分子检测并使实验室获得认可的意愿。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验