Harden R N, Bruehl S, Galer B S, Saltz S, Bertram M, Backonja M, Gayles R, Rudin N, Bhugra M K, Stanton-Hicks M
Center for Pain Studies, Room 1190, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, 345 E. Superior St., Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Pain. 1999 Nov;83(2):211-9. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00104-9.
This is a multisite study examining the internal validity and comprehensiveness of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) diagnostic criteria for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). A standardized sign/symptom checklist was used in patient evaluations to obtain data on CRPS-related signs and symptoms in a series of 123 patients meeting IASP criteria for CRPS. Principal components factor analysis (PCA) was used to detect statistical groupings of signs/symptoms (factors). CRPS signs and symptoms grouped together statistically in a manner somewhat different than in current IASP/CRPS criteria. As in current criteria, a separate pain/sensation criterion was supported. However, unlike in current criteria, PCA indicated that vasomotor symptoms form a factor distinct from a sudomotor/edema factor. Changes in range of motion, motor dysfunction, and trophic changes, which are not included in the IASP criteria, formed a distinct fourth factor. Scores on the pain/sensation factor correlated positively with pain duration (P<0. 001), but there was a negative correlation between the sudomotor/edema factor scores and pain duration (P<0.05). The motor/trophic factor predicted positive responses to sympathetic block (P<0.05). These results suggest that the internal validity of the IASP/CRPS criteria could be improved by separating vasomotor signs/symptoms (e.g. temperature and skin color asymmetry) from those reflecting sudomotor dysfunction (e.g. sweating changes) and edema. Results also indicate motor and trophic changes may be an important and distinct component of CRPS which is not currently incorporated in the IASP criteria. An experimental revision of CRPS diagnostic criteria for research purposes is proposed. Implications for diagnostic sensitivity and specificity are discussed.
这是一项多中心研究,旨在检验国际疼痛研究协会(IASP)制定的复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)诊断标准的内部效度和全面性。在患者评估中使用了标准化的体征/症状清单,以获取123例符合IASP的CRPS标准患者的CRPS相关体征和症状数据。主成分因子分析(PCA)用于检测体征/症状的统计分组(因子)。CRPS的体征和症状在统计学上的分组方式与当前IASP/CRPS标准略有不同。与当前标准一样,单独的疼痛/感觉标准得到了支持。然而,与当前标准不同的是,PCA表明血管运动症状形成了一个与出汗/水肿因子不同的因子。IASP标准中未包括的运动范围变化、运动功能障碍和营养改变形成了一个独特的第四因子。疼痛/感觉因子得分与疼痛持续时间呈正相关(P<0.001),但出汗/水肿因子得分与疼痛持续时间呈负相关(P<0.05)。运动/营养因子预测对交感神经阻滞有阳性反应(P<0.05)。这些结果表明,通过将血管运动体征/症状(如温度和皮肤颜色不对称)与反映出汗功能障碍(如出汗变化)和水肿的体征/症状分开,IASP/CRPS标准的内部效度可能会得到提高。结果还表明,运动和营养改变可能是CRPS的一个重要且独特的组成部分,目前IASP标准中并未纳入。本文提出了用于研究目的的CRPS诊断标准的实验性修订版。并讨论了对诊断敏感性和特异性的影响。