• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Patient Findings Questionnaire: one solution to an important standardized patient examination problem.

作者信息

Williams R G, McLaughlin M A, Eulenberg B, Hurm M, Nendaz M R

机构信息

Department of Medical Education (M/C 591), University of Illinois at Chicago 60612, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 1999 Oct;74(10):1118-24. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199910000-00015.

DOI:10.1097/00001888-199910000-00015
PMID:10536634
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe the Patient Findings Questionnaire (PFQ) and compare its scores and pass/fail decisions with those obtained from standardized patient (SP) examination checklists.

METHOD

Checklists and PFQs were used to assess data acquisition by 790 second-year medical students. PFQs were composed of multiple-choice items designed to determine whether examines had acquired key historical patient information.

RESULTS

At the item level, the two measurement methods yielded the same decisions about data acquisition on 88% of observed occasions. Most discrepancies (74%) involved SPs rating examinees as having elicited information when the examinee was unable to answer the associated PFQ item. At the test level, the two instruments yielded the same pass/fail decision on a large majority of occasions.

CONCLUSIONS

The PFQ and checklist yielded similar data acquisition scores and decisions at the item and test levels. Replacement of the checklist with the PFQ should result in examinees' behaving in a way more consistent with recommended interviewing practices.

摘要

相似文献

1
The Patient Findings Questionnaire: one solution to an important standardized patient examination problem.
Acad Med. 1999 Oct;74(10):1118-24. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199910000-00015.
2
An analysis of standardised patient checklist errors and their effect on student scores.
Med Educ. 2003 Feb;37(2):99-104. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01416.x.
3
The impact of repeat information on examinee performance for a large-scale standardized-patient examination.重复信息对大规模标准化病人考试考生表现的影响。
Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9):1506-10. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eadb25.
4
Clinically discriminating checklists versus thoroughness checklists: improving the validity of performance test scores.临床鉴别检查表与全面性检查表:提高绩效测试分数的有效性。
Acad Med. 2014 Jul;89(7):1057-62. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000235.
5
Differential Weighting for Subcomponent Measures of Integrated Clinical Encounter Scores Based on the USMLE Step 2 CS Examination: Effects on Composite Score Reliability and Pass-Fail Decisions.基于美国医师执照考试第二步临床技能考试的综合临床问诊分数子成分测量的差异加权:对综合分数可靠性及通过-未通过决策的影响
Acad Med. 2016 Nov;91(11 Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S24-S30. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001359.
6
Can Nonclinician Raters Be Trained to Assess Clinical Reasoning in Postencounter Patient Notes?非临床评分者能否经过培训来评估患者就诊后记录中的临床推理?
Acad Med. 2019 Nov;94(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S21-S27. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002904.
7
Promoting diagnostic problem representation.促进诊断问题表征。
Med Educ. 2002 Aug;36(8):760-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01279.x.
8
Effects of examinee gender, standardized-patient gender, and their interaction on standardized patients' ratings of examinees' interpersonal and communication skills.考生性别、标准化病人性别及其交互作用对标准化病人对考生人际和沟通技能评分的影响。
Acad Med. 1993 Feb;68(2):153-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199302000-00013.
9
Performance of "standardized examinees" in a standardized-patient examination of clinical skills.“标准化考生”在临床技能标准化病人考试中的表现。
Acad Med. 1997 Nov;72(11):1008-11. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199711000-00021.
10
Examining the diagnostic justification abilities of fourth-year medical students.考察四年级医学生的诊断验证能力。
Acad Med. 2012 Aug;87(8):1008-14. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31825cfcff.