Rosenstein D L
National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda MD 20892-1277, USA.
Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Oct 15;46(8):1039-43. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00168-7.
Federal regulations governing human subjects research call for additional protections for the "mentally disabled." However, there is currently no consensus definition of mental disability or guidelines for how these research subjects should be protected. This ambiguity complicates the work of institutional review boards (IRBs) charged with the review and approval of protocols involving psychiatric medication discontinuation and symptom provocation. It is particularly important for these studies to be reviewed within the larger context of the research program in which they are conducted. The author proposes a process for IRB review of these studies, which includes the implementation of additional safeguards for subjects determined by the IRB to be vulnerable. Recommendations also are made for training psychiatric clinical investigators in issues related to research bioethics.
管理人体受试者研究的联邦法规要求对“精神残疾者”给予额外保护。然而,目前对于精神残疾尚无共识定义,也没有关于应如何保护这些研究受试者的指导方针。这种模糊性使负责审查和批准涉及停用精神科药物及症状激发的研究方案的机构审查委员会(IRB)的工作变得复杂。在开展这些研究的更大研究项目背景下对其进行审查尤为重要。作者提出了一个IRB审查这些研究的流程,其中包括对IRB认定为易受伤害的受试者实施额外保障措施。还就培训精神科临床研究人员有关研究生物伦理问题提出了建议。