Drutz H P, Appell R A, Gleason D, Klimberg I, Radomski S
University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Ontario, Canada.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10(5):283-9. doi: 10.1007/s001929970003.
This study compared the clinical efficacy (determined from micturition diaries) and safety of 12 weeks' treatment with either tolterodine 2 mg twice daily, oxybutynin 5 mg three times daily or placebo in patients with an overactive bladder. A total of 277 patients were randomized and treated at 25 centers. Both tolterodine and oxybutynin significantly increased volume voided/micturition compared to placebo. Both treatment groups evoked greater decreases in micturitions per 24 hours and incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to placebo; however, only tolterodine was significantly better than placebo in reducing micturition frequency. Tolterodine and oxybutynin were equivalent in their effectiveness. Tolterodine was significantly better tolerated than oxybutynin when adverse events (particularly frequency and intensity of dry mouth), dose reduction and patient withdrawals were considered. Oxybutynin is an effective drug whose frequent adverse effects limit its clinical usefulness. Tolterodine has equivalent efficacy to oxybutynin, but with less severe adverse effects. This will allow patients to receive more effective treatment for their condition, with better compliance.
本研究比较了在膀胱过度活动症患者中,每日两次服用2毫克托特罗定、每日三次服用5毫克奥昔布宁或服用安慰剂进行12周治疗的临床疗效(根据排尿日记确定)和安全性。共有277例患者在25个中心进行了随机分组和治疗。与安慰剂相比,托特罗定和奥昔布宁均显著增加了每次排尿的尿量。与安慰剂相比,两个治疗组每24小时的排尿次数和尿失禁发作次数均有更大程度的减少;然而,只有托特罗定在降低排尿频率方面显著优于安慰剂。托特罗定和奥昔布宁的疗效相当。在考虑不良事件(尤其是口干的频率和强度)、剂量减少和患者退出情况时,托特罗定的耐受性明显优于奥昔布宁。奥昔布宁是一种有效的药物,但其频繁的不良反应限制了其临床应用。托特罗定与奥昔布宁疗效相当,但不良反应较轻。这将使患者能够接受更有效的治疗,依从性更好。