Abrams P, Freeman R, Anderström C, Mattiasson A
Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Br J Urol. 1998 Jun;81(6):801-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00717.x.
To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine with that of oxybutynin in patients with an overactive bladder.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multinational phase-III study was conducted in urology and gynaecology clinics in the UK, Republic of Ireland and Sweden. The study enrolled 293 patients with urodynamically confirmed bladder overactivity, increased frequency of micturition (> or = micturitions/24 h) and symptoms of urgency and/or urge incontinence (> or = 1 episode/24 h). Patients received either tolterodine (2 mg twice daily) or oxybutynin (5 mg three times daily) or placebo. Doses could be reduced, to prevent withdrawal, to 1 mg or 2.5 mg, respectively. The main outcome measures were the mean change from baseline in frequency of micturition/24 h, the number of incontinent episodes/24 h and volume voided per micturition.
After 12 weeks' treatment, the mean frequency of micturition decreased by 21% and 19.5% in those receiving tolterodine (n = 118) and oxybutynin (n = 118), respectively, and by 10.5% in those on placebo (n = 57). Among those with urge incontinence at baseline (75% of patients), the mean number of incontinent episodes decreased by 47%, 71% and 19%, respectively, in those receiving tolterodine, oxybutynin and placebo. The effect of tolterodine and oxybutynin on these two micturition variables was statistically equivalent. There was also a comparable increase in mean volume voided per micturition in the tolterodine (27%) and oxybutynin groups (31%), compared with 7% in the placebo group. Dry mouth was the most common adverse event and was reported with greater frequency and intensity among patients receiving oxybutynin than among those receiving either tolterodine or placebo. In the oxybutynin group, more patients also withdrew because of adverse events and a greater proportion required dose reduction as a result of adverse events. Despite dose reduction, the frequency of adverse events and the intensity of dry mouth remained higher among those receiving oxybutynin (2.5 mg three times daily) than in patients who remained on tolterodine 2 mg twice daily.
Tolterodine 2 mg twice daily is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of bladder overactivity. Tolterodine was better tolerated than oxybutynin, particularly with respect to the frequency and intensity of dry mouth, but had comparable clinical efficacy. The superior tolerability of tolterodine therefore allows more patients to remain on effective therapy than the current most commonly prescribed agent for the treatment of the overactive bladder.
比较托特罗定与奥昔布宁治疗膀胱过度活动症患者的疗效和耐受性。
在英国、爱尔兰共和国和瑞典的泌尿外科和妇科诊所进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、多国III期研究。该研究纳入了293例经尿动力学证实膀胱过度活动、排尿频率增加(≥排尿次数/24小时)以及尿急和/或急迫性尿失禁症状(≥1次发作/24小时)的患者。患者接受托特罗定(每日2次,每次2mg)或奥昔布宁(每日3次,每次5mg)或安慰剂治疗。为防止停药,剂量可分别减至1mg或2.5mg。主要观察指标为排尿频率/24小时较基线的平均变化、尿失禁发作次数/24小时以及每次排尿量。
治疗12周后,接受托特罗定治疗的患者(n = 118)和接受奥昔布宁治疗的患者(n = 118)的排尿频率平均分别下降了21%和19.5%,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者(n = 57)下降了10.5%。在基线时有急迫性尿失禁的患者(占患者总数75%)中,接受托特罗定、奥昔布宁和安慰剂治疗的患者尿失禁发作的平均次数分别减少了47%、71%和19%。托特罗定和奥昔布宁对这两个排尿变量的影响在统计学上相当。与安慰剂组增加7%相比,托特罗定组(增加27%)和奥昔布宁组(增加31%)每次排尿量的平均增加幅度也相当。口干是最常见的不良事件,与接受托特罗定或安慰剂治疗的患者相比,接受奥昔布宁治疗的患者中报告口干的频率和严重程度更高。在奥昔布宁组中也有更多患者因不良事件而停药,并且有更大比例的患者因不良事件需要减少剂量。尽管减少了剂量,但接受奥昔布宁(每日3次,每次2.5mg)治疗的患者中不良事件的频率和口干的严重程度仍高于继续接受托特罗定每日2次,每次2mg治疗的患者。
每日2次,每次2mg的托特罗定治疗膀胱过度活动有效且耐受性良好。托特罗定的耐受性优于奥昔布宁,特别是在口干的频率和严重程度方面,但临床疗效相当。因此,与目前治疗膀胱过度活动最常用的药物相比,托特罗定更好的耐受性使更多患者能够继续接受有效治疗。