Harvey B G, Leopold P L, Hackett N R, Grasso T M, Williams P M, Tucker A L, Kaner R J, Ferris B, Gonda I, Sweeney T D, Ramalingam R, Kovesdi I, Shak S, Crystal R G
Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York 10021, USA.
J Clin Invest. 1999 Nov;104(9):1245-55. doi: 10.1172/JCI7935.
We sought to evaluate the ability of an E1(-), E3(-) adenovirus (Ad) vector (Ad(GV)CFTR.10) to transfer the normal human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) cDNA to the airway epithelium of individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF). We administered Ad(GV)CFTR.10 at doses of 3 x 10(6) to 2 x 10(9) plaque-forming units over 9 months by endobronchial spray to 7 pairs of individuals with CF. Each 3-month cycle, we measured vector-derived versus endogenous CFTR mRNA in airway epithelial cells prior to therapy, as well as 3 and 30 days after therapy. The data demonstrate that (a) this strategy appears to be safe; (b) after the first administration, vector-derived CFTR cDNA expression in the CF airway epithelium is dose-dependent, with greater than 5% endogenous CFTR mRNA levels at the higher vector doses; (c) expression is transient, lasting less than 30 days; (d) expression can be achieved with a second administration, but only at intermediate doses, and no expression is observed with the third administration; and (e) the progressive lack of expression with repetitive administration does not closely correlate with induction of systemic anti-Ad neutralizing antibodies. The major advantage of an Ad vector is that it can deliver sufficient levels of CFTR cDNA to the airway epithelium so that CFTR expression protects the lungs from the respiratory manifestations of CF. However, this impressive level of expression is linked to the challenging fact that expression is limited in time. Although this can be initially overcome by repetitive administration, unknown mechanisms eventually limit this strategy, and further repetitive administration does not lead to repetitive expression.
我们试图评估一种E1(-)、E3(-)腺病毒(Ad)载体(Ad(GV)CFTR.10)将正常人囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节因子(CFTR)cDNA转移至囊性纤维化(CF)患者气道上皮的能力。我们通过支气管内喷雾,在9个月内给7对CF患者施用剂量为3×10⁶至2×10⁹噬斑形成单位的Ad(GV)CFTR.10。在每个3个月周期中,我们在治疗前以及治疗后3天和30天测量气道上皮细胞中载体衍生的与内源性CFTR mRNA。数据表明:(a)该策略似乎是安全的;(b)首次给药后,CF气道上皮中载体衍生的CFTR cDNA表达呈剂量依赖性,在较高载体剂量下内源性CFTR mRNA水平大于5%;(c)表达是短暂的,持续时间不到30天;(d)第二次给药可实现表达,但仅在中等剂量时,第三次给药未观察到表达;(e)重复给药后表达逐渐缺乏与全身抗Ad中和抗体的诱导没有密切相关性。Ad载体的主要优点是它可以将足够水平的CFTR cDNA递送至气道上皮,从而使CFTR表达保护肺部免受CF的呼吸表现影响。然而,这种令人印象深刻的表达水平与表达时间有限这一具有挑战性的事实有关。虽然这可以通过重复给药最初克服,但未知机制最终限制了该策略,进一步重复给药不会导致重复表达。