上颌窦癌的治疗:1997年与1977年美国癌症联合委员会分期系统的比较

Treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma: a comparison of the 1997 and 1977 American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems.

作者信息

Le Q T, Fu K K, Kaplan M, Terris D J, Fee W E, Goffinet D R

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5302, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 1999 Nov 1;86(9):1700-11.

DOI:
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system to predict survival and local control of patients with maxillary sinus carcinoma and to identify significant factors for overall survival, local control, and distant metastases in patients with these tumors.

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients with maxillary sinus carcinoma were treated with radiotherapy at Stanford University and the University of California, San Francisco between 1959-1996. The histologic type of carcinoma among the 97 patients were: 58 squamous cell carcinomas, 4 adenocarcinomas, 16 undifferentiated carcinomas, and 19 adenoid cystic carcinomas. All patients were restaged clinically according to the 1977 and 1997 AJCC staging systems. The T classification of the tumors of the patients was as follows: 8 with T2, 18 with T3, and 71 with T4 according to the 1977 system and 8 with T2, 36 with T3, and 53 with T4 according to the 1997 system. Eleven patients had lymph node involvement at diagnosis. Thirty-six patients were treated with radiotherapy alone and 61 received a combination of surgical and radiation treatments. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 78 months.

RESULTS

The 5-year and 10-year actuarial survival rates for all patients were 34% and 31%, respectively. The 5-year survival estimate by the 1977 AJCC system (P = 0.06) was 75% for Stage II, 19% for Stage III, and 34% for Stage IV and by the 1997 AJCC system (P = 0.006) was 75% for Stage II, 37% for Stage III, and 28% for Stage IV. Significant prognostic factors for survival by multivariate analysis included age (favoring younger age, P<0.001), 1997 T classification (favoring T2-3, P = 0. 001), lymph node involvement at diagnosis (favoring N0, P = 0.002), treatment modality of the primary tumor site (favoring surgery and radiotherapy, P = 0.009), and gender (favoring female patients, P = 0.04). The overall radiation time was of borderline significance (favoring shorter time, P = 0.06). The actuarial 5-year local control rate was 43%. By the 1977 AJCC system (P = 0.78) it was 62% with T2, 36% with T3, and 45% with T4 and using the 1997 AJCC system (P = 0.29) it was 62% with T2, 53% with T3, and 36% with T4. The only significant prognostic factor for local control for all patients by multivariate analysis was local therapy, favoring surgery and radiotherapy over radiotherapy alone (P< 0.001). For patients treated with surgery, pathologic margin status correlated with local control (P = 0.007) and for patients treated with radiation alone, higher tumor dose (P = 0.007) and shorter overall treatment time (P = 0.04) were associated with fewer local recurrences. The 5-year estimate of freedom from distant metastases was 66%. The 1997 T classification, N classification, and lymph node recurrence were adverse prognostic factors for distant metastases on multivariate analysis. There were 22 complications in 16 patients, representing a 30% actuarial risk of developing late complications at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The 1997 AJCC staging system was found to be superior to the 1977 AJCC staging system in predicting both survival and local control in this patient population. Combined surgical and radiation treatment to the primary tumor yielded higher survival and local control than radiotherapy alone. Other significant prognostic factors for survival were patient age, gender, and lymph node (N) classification. Prolonged overall radiation time was associated with poorer survival and local control. Late severe toxicity from the treatment of these tumors was a significant problem in long term survivors. Improved radiotherapy techniques should lead to decreased injury to the surrounding normal tissues. (c) 1999 American Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估1997年美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统预测上颌窦癌患者生存率和局部控制情况的有效性,并确定这些肿瘤患者总生存、局部控制和远处转移的重要因素。

方法

1959年至1996年间,斯坦福大学和加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校对97例上颌窦癌患者进行了放射治疗。97例患者的癌组织学类型为:58例鳞状细胞癌、4例腺癌、16例未分化癌和19例腺样囊性癌。所有患者均根据1977年和1997年AJCC分期系统进行临床重新分期。根据1977年系统,患者肿瘤的T分类如下:T2为8例,T3为18例,T4为71例;根据1997年系统,T2为8例,T3为36例,T4为53例。11例患者在诊断时伴有淋巴结受累。36例患者仅接受放射治疗,61例接受手术和放射治疗联合治疗。存活患者的中位随访时间为78个月。

结果

所有患者的5年和10年精算生存率分别为34%和31%。根据1977年AJCC系统(P = 0.06),Ⅱ期患者的5年生存率估计为75%,Ⅲ期为19%,Ⅳ期为34%;根据1997年AJCC系统(P = 0.006),Ⅱ期为75%,Ⅲ期为37%,Ⅳ期为28%。多因素分析显示,生存的重要预后因素包括年龄(年轻者预后较好,P<0.001)、1997年T分类(T2 - 3者预后较好,P = 0.001)、诊断时淋巴结受累情况(N0者预后较好,P = 0.002)、原发肿瘤部位的治疗方式(手术和放射治疗联合者预后较好,P = 0.009)以及性别(女性患者预后较好,P = 0.04)。总放疗时间具有临界显著性(时间较短者预后较好,P = 0.06)。精算5年局部控制率为43%。根据1977年AJCC系统(P = 0.78),T2患者为62%,T3患者为36%,T4患者为45%;根据1997年AJCC系统(P = 0.29),T2患者为62%,T3患者为53%,T4患者为36%。多因素分析显示,所有患者局部控制的唯一重要预后因素是局部治疗方式,手术和放射治疗联合优于单纯放射治疗(P<0.001)。对于接受手术治疗的患者,病理切缘状态与局部控制相关(P = 0.007);对于仅接受放射治疗的患者,较高的肿瘤剂量(P = 0.007)和较短的总治疗时间(P = 0.04)与较少的局部复发相关。5年无远处转移估计率为66%。多因素分析显示,1997年T分类、N分类和淋巴结复发是远处转移的不良预后因素。16例患者出现22例并发症,10年发生晚期并发症的精算风险为30%。

结论

在该患者群体中,发现1997年AJCC分期系统在预测生存率和局部控制方面优于1977年AJCC分期系统。原发肿瘤采用手术和放射治疗联合的生存率和局部控制率高于单纯放射治疗。生存的其他重要预后因素是患者年龄、性别和淋巴结(N)分类。总放疗时间延长与较差的生存率和局部控制相关。这些肿瘤治疗导致的晚期严重毒性是长期存活者的一个重要问题。改进的放射治疗技术应能减少对周围正常组织的损伤。(c)1999美国癌症协会

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索