• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低分子量肝素(达肝素)与普通肝素在连续性静脉-静脉血液透析滤过中作为抗凝剂的对照试验。

A controlled trial of low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) versus unfractionated heparin as anticoagulant during continuous venovenous hemodialysis with filtration.

作者信息

Reeves J H, Cumming A R, Gallagher L, O'Brien J L, Santamaria J D

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1999 Oct;27(10):2224-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199910000-00026.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-199910000-00026
PMID:10548211
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of fixed-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) with adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin as anticoagulant for continuous hemofiltration.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

University-affiliated adult intensive care unit

PATIENTS

All patients requiring continuous hemofiltration for acute renal failure or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) were eligible. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled. Eleven were excluded, seven because of major protocol violations and four died before hemofiltration.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received continuous venovenous hemodialysis with filtration with prefilter replacement at 500 mL/hr and countercurrent dialysate at 1000 mL/hr. Filters were primed with normal saline containing anticoagulant. Dalteparin-treated patients received a commencement bolus of 20 units/kg and a maintenance infusion at 10 units/kg/hr. Heparin-treated patients received a commencement bolus of 2000-5000 units and a maintenance infusion at 10 units/kg/hr, titrated to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin time in the patient of 70-80 secs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome measure--time to failure of the hemofilter--was compared using survival analysis. Twenty-two patients (13 with acute renal failure and nine with SIRS; total, 41 filters) were randomized to heparin. Twenty-five patients (16 with acute renal failure and nine with SIRS; total, 41 filters) were randomized to dalteparin. Mean (SE) activated partial thromboplastin time in the heparin group was 79 (4.3) secs. Mean (SE) anti-factor-Xa activity in the six patients given dalteparin who were assayed was 0.49 (0.07). Mean (SE) prehemofiltration platelet count was 225 (35.5) x 10(9) for heparin and 178 (18.1) x 10(9) for dalteparin (p = .24, unpaired Student's t-test). Mean (SE) prehemofiltration hemoglobin was 11.4 (0.61) g/dL for heparin and 10.6 (0.38) g/dL for dalteparin (p = .31, unpaired Student's t-test).

PRIMARY OUTCOME

There was no significant difference in the time to failure between the two groups (p = .75, log rank test). For dalteparin, Kaplan-Meier (K-M) mean (SE) time to failure of the hemofilter was 46.8 (5.03) hrs. For heparin, K-M mean (SE) time to failure was 51.7 (7.51) hrs. The 95% CI for difference in mean time to failure was -13 to 23 hrs. The power of this study to detect a 50% change in filter life was >90%.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Mean (SE) reduction in platelet count during hemofiltration was 63 (25.8) x 10(9) for heparin and 41.8 (26.6) x 10(9) for dalteparin (p = .57, unpaired Student's t-test). Eight patients given dalteparin and four patients given heparin had screening for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; three of the dalteparin patients and one of the heparin patients were positive (p = 1.0, Fisher's exact test). There were three episodes of trivial bleeding and two episodes of significant bleeding for dalteparin, and there were three episodes of trivial bleeding and four episodes of significant bleeding for heparin (p = .53, chi-square test). The mean (SE) decrease in hemoglobin concentration during hemofiltration was 0.51 (0.54) g/dL for heparin and 0.28 (0.49) g/dL for dalteparin (p = .75, unpaired Student's t-test). The mean (SE) packed-cell transfusion volume during hemofiltration was 309 (128) mL for heparin and 290 (87) mL for dalteparin (p = .90, unpaired Student's t-test). Daily costs, including coagulation assays, of hemofiltration were approximately 10% higher using dalteparin than with heparin.

CONCLUSIONS

Fixed-dose dalteparin provided identical filter life, comparable safety, but increased total daily cost compared with adjusted-dose heparin. Unfractionated heparin remains our anticoagulant of choice for continuous hemofiltration in intensive care.

摘要

目的

比较固定剂量低分子量肝素(达肝素)与调整剂量普通肝素作为持续血液滤过抗凝剂的疗效、安全性和成本。

设计

前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验。

地点

大学附属医院成人重症监护病房

患者

所有因急性肾衰竭或全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)需要进行持续血液滤过的患者均符合条件。共纳入57例患者。11例被排除,7例因严重违反方案,4例在血液滤过前死亡。

干预措施

患者接受持续静静脉血液透析滤过,预滤器以500 mL/小时的速度更换,逆流透析液以1000 mL/小时的速度进行。滤器用含抗凝剂的生理盐水预充。接受达肝素治疗的患者起始推注剂量为20单位/千克,维持输注速度为10单位/千克/小时。接受肝素治疗的患者起始推注剂量为2000 - 5000单位,维持输注速度为10单位/千克/小时,根据患者活化部分凝血活酶时间调整剂量至70 - 80秒。

测量指标及主要结果

采用生存分析比较主要结局指标——滤器失效时间。22例患者(13例急性肾衰竭,9例SIRS;共41个滤器)被随机分配至肝素组。25例患者(16例急性肾衰竭,9例SIRS;共41个滤器)被随机分配至达肝素组。肝素组活化部分凝血活酶时间的均值(标准误)为79(4.3)秒。6例接受达肝素治疗且接受检测的患者抗Xa因子活性均值(标准误)为0.49(0.07)。肝素组血液滤过前血小板计数均值(标准误)为225(35.5)×10⁹,达肝素组为178(18.1)×10⁹(p = 0.24,非配对学生t检验)。肝素组血液滤过前血红蛋白均值(标准误)为11.4(0.61)g/dL,达肝素组为10.6(0.38)g/dL(p = 0.31,非配对学生t检验)。

主要结局

两组滤器失效时间无显著差异(p = 0.75,对数秩检验)。达肝素组滤器失效的Kaplan - Meier(K - M)均值(标准误)时间为46.8(5.03)小时。肝素组滤器失效的K - M均值(标准误)时间为51.7(7.51)小时。滤器失效平均时间差异的95%置信区间为 - 13至23小时。本研究检测滤器寿命50%变化的效能>90%。

次要结局

血液滤过期间肝素组血小板计数均值(标准误)下降63(25.8)×10⁹,达肝素组为41.8(26.6)×10⁹(p = 0.57,非配对学生t检验)。8例接受达肝素治疗的患者和4例接受肝素治疗的患者接受了肝素诱导的血小板减少症筛查;达肝素组3例患者和肝素组1例患者筛查结果为阳性(p = 1.0,Fisher精确检验)。达肝素组有3例轻微出血事件和2例严重出血事件,肝素组有3例轻微出血事件和4例严重出血事件(p = 0.53,卡方检验)。血液滤过期间肝素组血红蛋白浓度均值(标准误)下降0.51(0.54)g/dL,达肝素组为0.28(0.49)g/dL(p = 0.75,非配对学生t检验)。血液滤过期间肝素组红细胞压积输血总量均值(标准误)为309(128)mL,达肝素组为290(87)mL(p = 0.90,非配对学生t检验)。使用达肝素进行血液滤过的每日成本(包括凝血检测)比使用肝素高约10%。

结论

与调整剂量肝素相比,固定剂量达肝素的滤器寿命相同,安全性相当,但每日总成本增加。普通肝素仍是我们在重症监护中持续血液滤过的首选抗凝剂。

相似文献

1
A controlled trial of low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) versus unfractionated heparin as anticoagulant during continuous venovenous hemodialysis with filtration.低分子量肝素(达肝素)与普通肝素在连续性静脉-静脉血液透析滤过中作为抗凝剂的对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Oct;27(10):2224-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199910000-00026.
2
Nadroparin versus dalteparin anticoagulation in high-volume, continuous venovenous hemofiltration: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.那屈肝素与达肝素在高容量连续性静脉-静脉血液滤过中的抗凝作用:一项双盲、随机、交叉研究。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb;28(2):421-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00022.
3
Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin for prevention of hemofilter occlusion during continuous renal replacement therapy.比伐卢定与普通肝素预防连续性肾脏替代治疗中血液滤器阻塞的比较。
Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Nov;30(11):1117-26. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.11.1117.
4
Enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration: a randomized controlled crossover study.依诺肝素与普通肝素用于持续静脉-静脉血液滤过抗凝的随机对照交叉研究
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Sep;33(9):1571-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0719-7. Epub 2007 Jun 12.
5
Anticoagulation with prostaglandin E1 and unfractionated heparin during continuous venovenous hemofiltration.持续静脉-静脉血液滤过期间使用前列腺素E1和普通肝素进行抗凝治疗。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Jul;26(7):1208-12. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199807000-00021.
6
Anticoagulation with prostaglandins and unfractionated heparin during continuous venovenous haemofiltration: a randomized controlled trial.持续静脉-静脉血液滤过期间使用前列腺素和普通肝素抗凝:一项随机对照试验。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002 Feb 15;114(3):96-101.
7
Prefilter bivalirudin for preventing hemofilter occlusion in continuous renal replacement therapy.用于连续肾脏替代治疗中预防血液滤过器阻塞的预滤器比伐芦定
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Jul;43(7):1360-5. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M179. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
8
Citrate anticoagulation versus systemic heparinisation in continuous venovenous hemofiltration in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a multi-center randomized clinical trial.急性肾损伤危重症患者连续性静脉-静脉血液滤过中枸橼酸盐抗凝与全身肝素化的比较:一项多中心随机临床试验
Crit Care. 2014 Aug 16;18(4):472. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0472-6.
9
Anticoagulation with prostacyclin and heparin during continuous venovenous hemofiltration.在持续静脉-静脉血液滤过期间使用前列环素和肝素进行抗凝。
Crit Care Med. 1994 Nov;22(11):1774-81.
10
Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration without anticoagulation in high-risk patients.高危患者无抗凝的持续静脉-静脉血液滤过
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Nov;26(11):1652-7. doi: 10.1007/s001340000691.

引用本文的文献

1
[S3 guideline on renal replacement therapy in intensive care medicine : Evidence-based implementation of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients].[重症医学中肾脏替代治疗的S3指南:危重症患者肾脏替代治疗的循证实施]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s00063-025-01293-6.
2
Regional Citrate Anticoagulation Versus Systemic Heparin in Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy: Examining the Role of Evidence in Health Technology Assessment.连续性肾脏替代治疗中局部枸橼酸抗凝与全身肝素抗凝的比较:探讨证据在卫生技术评估中的作用
Adv Ther. 2025 Jun;42(6):2606-2638. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03186-8. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
3
Decrease in platelet count in patients with AKI and its association with major adverse kidney events.
急性肾损伤患者血小板计数的降低及其与主要不良肾脏事件的关联。
Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(1):2359643. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2359643. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
4
Anticoagulation options for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.危重症患者连续性肾脏替代治疗的抗凝选择:系统评价和网络荟萃分析的随机对照试验。
Crit Care. 2023 Jun 7;27(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04519-1.
5
Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy.药物干预预防连续性肾脏替代治疗中体外循环凝血。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 14;12(12):CD012467. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012467.pub3.
6
Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy.连续肾脏替代治疗期间预防体外循环凝血的药理学干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 13;3(3):CD012467. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012467.pub2.
7
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Who, When, Why, and How.连续性肾脏替代治疗:谁、何时、为何以及如何。
Chest. 2019 Mar;155(3):626-638. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
8
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for acute kidney injury 2016.《2016年日本急性肾损伤临床实践指南》
J Intensive Care. 2018 Aug 13;6:48. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0308-6. eCollection 2018.
9
The Japanese clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury 2016.《2016年日本急性肾损伤临床实践指南》
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018 Oct;22(5):985-1045. doi: 10.1007/s10157-018-1600-4.
10
Unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparins for avoiding heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in postoperative patients.普通肝素与低分子量肝素用于预防术后患者肝素诱导的血小板减少症的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 21;4(4):CD007557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007557.pub3.