Reeves J H, Cumming A R, Gallagher L, O'Brien J L, Santamaria J D
Intensive Care Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Crit Care Med. 1999 Oct;27(10):2224-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199910000-00026.
To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of fixed-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) with adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin as anticoagulant for continuous hemofiltration.
Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
University-affiliated adult intensive care unit
All patients requiring continuous hemofiltration for acute renal failure or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) were eligible. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled. Eleven were excluded, seven because of major protocol violations and four died before hemofiltration.
Patients received continuous venovenous hemodialysis with filtration with prefilter replacement at 500 mL/hr and countercurrent dialysate at 1000 mL/hr. Filters were primed with normal saline containing anticoagulant. Dalteparin-treated patients received a commencement bolus of 20 units/kg and a maintenance infusion at 10 units/kg/hr. Heparin-treated patients received a commencement bolus of 2000-5000 units and a maintenance infusion at 10 units/kg/hr, titrated to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin time in the patient of 70-80 secs.
The primary outcome measure--time to failure of the hemofilter--was compared using survival analysis. Twenty-two patients (13 with acute renal failure and nine with SIRS; total, 41 filters) were randomized to heparin. Twenty-five patients (16 with acute renal failure and nine with SIRS; total, 41 filters) were randomized to dalteparin. Mean (SE) activated partial thromboplastin time in the heparin group was 79 (4.3) secs. Mean (SE) anti-factor-Xa activity in the six patients given dalteparin who were assayed was 0.49 (0.07). Mean (SE) prehemofiltration platelet count was 225 (35.5) x 10(9) for heparin and 178 (18.1) x 10(9) for dalteparin (p = .24, unpaired Student's t-test). Mean (SE) prehemofiltration hemoglobin was 11.4 (0.61) g/dL for heparin and 10.6 (0.38) g/dL for dalteparin (p = .31, unpaired Student's t-test).
There was no significant difference in the time to failure between the two groups (p = .75, log rank test). For dalteparin, Kaplan-Meier (K-M) mean (SE) time to failure of the hemofilter was 46.8 (5.03) hrs. For heparin, K-M mean (SE) time to failure was 51.7 (7.51) hrs. The 95% CI for difference in mean time to failure was -13 to 23 hrs. The power of this study to detect a 50% change in filter life was >90%.
Mean (SE) reduction in platelet count during hemofiltration was 63 (25.8) x 10(9) for heparin and 41.8 (26.6) x 10(9) for dalteparin (p = .57, unpaired Student's t-test). Eight patients given dalteparin and four patients given heparin had screening for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; three of the dalteparin patients and one of the heparin patients were positive (p = 1.0, Fisher's exact test). There were three episodes of trivial bleeding and two episodes of significant bleeding for dalteparin, and there were three episodes of trivial bleeding and four episodes of significant bleeding for heparin (p = .53, chi-square test). The mean (SE) decrease in hemoglobin concentration during hemofiltration was 0.51 (0.54) g/dL for heparin and 0.28 (0.49) g/dL for dalteparin (p = .75, unpaired Student's t-test). The mean (SE) packed-cell transfusion volume during hemofiltration was 309 (128) mL for heparin and 290 (87) mL for dalteparin (p = .90, unpaired Student's t-test). Daily costs, including coagulation assays, of hemofiltration were approximately 10% higher using dalteparin than with heparin.
Fixed-dose dalteparin provided identical filter life, comparable safety, but increased total daily cost compared with adjusted-dose heparin. Unfractionated heparin remains our anticoagulant of choice for continuous hemofiltration in intensive care.
比较固定剂量低分子量肝素(达肝素)与调整剂量普通肝素作为持续血液滤过抗凝剂的疗效、安全性和成本。
前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验。
大学附属医院成人重症监护病房
所有因急性肾衰竭或全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)需要进行持续血液滤过的患者均符合条件。共纳入57例患者。11例被排除,7例因严重违反方案,4例在血液滤过前死亡。
患者接受持续静静脉血液透析滤过,预滤器以500 mL/小时的速度更换,逆流透析液以1000 mL/小时的速度进行。滤器用含抗凝剂的生理盐水预充。接受达肝素治疗的患者起始推注剂量为20单位/千克,维持输注速度为10单位/千克/小时。接受肝素治疗的患者起始推注剂量为2000 - 5000单位,维持输注速度为10单位/千克/小时,根据患者活化部分凝血活酶时间调整剂量至70 - 80秒。
采用生存分析比较主要结局指标——滤器失效时间。22例患者(13例急性肾衰竭,9例SIRS;共41个滤器)被随机分配至肝素组。25例患者(16例急性肾衰竭,9例SIRS;共41个滤器)被随机分配至达肝素组。肝素组活化部分凝血活酶时间的均值(标准误)为79(4.3)秒。6例接受达肝素治疗且接受检测的患者抗Xa因子活性均值(标准误)为0.49(0.07)。肝素组血液滤过前血小板计数均值(标准误)为225(35.5)×10⁹,达肝素组为178(18.1)×10⁹(p = 0.24,非配对学生t检验)。肝素组血液滤过前血红蛋白均值(标准误)为11.4(0.61)g/dL,达肝素组为10.6(0.38)g/dL(p = 0.31,非配对学生t检验)。
两组滤器失效时间无显著差异(p = 0.75,对数秩检验)。达肝素组滤器失效的Kaplan - Meier(K - M)均值(标准误)时间为46.8(5.03)小时。肝素组滤器失效的K - M均值(标准误)时间为51.7(7.51)小时。滤器失效平均时间差异的95%置信区间为 - 13至23小时。本研究检测滤器寿命50%变化的效能>90%。
血液滤过期间肝素组血小板计数均值(标准误)下降63(25.8)×10⁹,达肝素组为41.8(26.6)×10⁹(p = 0.57,非配对学生t检验)。8例接受达肝素治疗的患者和4例接受肝素治疗的患者接受了肝素诱导的血小板减少症筛查;达肝素组3例患者和肝素组1例患者筛查结果为阳性(p = 1.0,Fisher精确检验)。达肝素组有3例轻微出血事件和2例严重出血事件,肝素组有3例轻微出血事件和4例严重出血事件(p = 0.53,卡方检验)。血液滤过期间肝素组血红蛋白浓度均值(标准误)下降0.51(0.54)g/dL,达肝素组为0.28(0.49)g/dL(p = 0.75,非配对学生t检验)。血液滤过期间肝素组红细胞压积输血总量均值(标准误)为309(128)mL,达肝素组为290(87)mL(p = 0.90,非配对学生t检验)。使用达肝素进行血液滤过的每日成本(包括凝血检测)比使用肝素高约10%。
与调整剂量肝素相比,固定剂量达肝素的滤器寿命相同,安全性相当,但每日总成本增加。普通肝素仍是我们在重症监护中持续血液滤过的首选抗凝剂。