Bednarz G, Downes M B, Corn B W, Curran W J, Goldman H W
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center of the Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, and the Neurosensory Institute of Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107-5097, USA.
Neurosurgery. 1999 Nov;45(5):1156-61; discussion 1161-3. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199911000-00028.
This study was undertaken to determine the impact of geometric distortions on the spatial accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided stereotactic localization for gamma knife functional radiosurgery.
The spatial accuracy of MRI was evaluated by comparing stereotactic coordinates of intracranial targets, external fiducials, and anatomic structures defined by computed tomographic and MRI studies of the Radionics skull phantom (Radionics, Inc., Burlington, MA), the Rando head phantom, and 11 patients who underwent gamma knife functional radiosurgery. The distortion in MRI was assessed from computed tomographic and MRI fusion studies for these patients, as well as from MRI studies acquired by swapping the direction of the magnetic field gradients for five patients who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery and three patients who underwent MRI-guided frameless surgery. A follow-up program to compare the location of the created lesion with the intended target complemented the analysis.
The average difference between computed tomographic and MRI stereotactic coordinates of external fiducials, intracranial targets, and anatomic landmarks was of the order of 1 pixel size (0.9 x 0.9 x 1 mm3) along the x, y, and z axes. The average linear scaling along these axes as determined by fusion studies was approximately 0.8% and consistent with a single pixel. The follow-up studies, available for seven patients, revealed good agreement between the location of the created lesion and the intended target.
The spatial accuracy of an MRI-based localization system can be comparable to computed tomography-based localization with the added benefit of MRI resolution. Both machine- and object-related MRI distortions can be reduced to an acceptable level with contemporary scanners, optimized scanning sequences, and distortion-resistant stereotactic instruments.
本研究旨在确定几何畸变对伽玛刀功能放射外科磁共振成像(MRI)引导立体定向定位空间准确性的影响。
通过比较颅内靶点、外部基准点以及由Radionics颅骨模型(Radionics公司,马萨诸塞州伯灵顿)、Rando头部模型的计算机断层扫描(CT)和MRI研究以及11例接受伽玛刀功能放射外科治疗的患者所定义的解剖结构的立体定向坐标,评估MRI的空间准确性。通过对这些患者的CT和MRI融合研究,以及对5例接受伽玛刀放射外科治疗和3例接受MRI引导无框架手术的患者交换磁场梯度方向后获得的MRI研究,评估MRI中的畸变。一项比较所创建病变位置与预期靶点的随访计划补充了该分析。
外部基准点、颅内靶点和解剖标志的CT与MRI立体定向坐标之间沿x、y和z轴的平均差异约为1个像素大小(0.9×0.9×1 mm3)。融合研究确定的沿这些轴的平均线性缩放约为0.8%,与单个像素一致。七名患者的随访研究表明,所创建病变的位置与预期靶点之间具有良好的一致性。
基于MRI的定位系统的空间准确性可与基于CT的定位相媲美,同时具有MRI分辨率的额外优势。通过当代扫描仪、优化的扫描序列和抗畸变立体定向仪器,与机器和物体相关的MRI畸变均可降低到可接受的水平。