Suppr超能文献

丙卡巴肼、洛莫司汀和长春新碱(PCV)化疗用于间变性星形细胞瘤:对放射肿瘤学组方案的回顾性研究,比较卡莫司汀或PCV辅助化疗的生存率。

Procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy for anaplastic astrocytoma: A retrospective review of radiation therapy oncology group protocols comparing survival with carmustine or PCV adjuvant chemotherapy.

作者信息

Prados M D, Scott C, Curran W J, Nelson D F, Leibel S, Kramer S

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0372, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1999 Nov;17(11):3389-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3389.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine any differences in outcome for patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) treated with adjuvant carmustine (BCNU) versus procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) database was reviewed for patients with newly diagnosed AA treated according to protocols that included either BCNU or PCV adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients were treated with radiation therapy. The outcome analysis included overall survival, taking into account patient age, extent of resection, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and treatment group (BCNU v PCV). Stratified and nonstratified Cox proportional hazards models were used, as well as an analysis using matched cases between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 257 patients were treated with BCNU according to RTOG protocols 70-18, 83-02, and 90-06; 175 patients were treated with PCV according to RTOG protocol 94-04. All pretreatment characteristics except KPS were well balanced by treatment group; 61% of the BCNU group had a KPS of 90 to 100 compared with 73% of the PCV group (P =.0075). No statistically significant difference in survival was observed in any age group or by KPS or extent of surgery. The stratified analysis also showed no trends for improved survival by treatment group (P =. 40). The Cox model identified only age, KPS, and extent of surgery as important variables influencing survival, not treatment group. Matching cases between groups using age, KPS, and surgery resulted in 133 matched pairs. No difference in survival was observed (P =. 41). In a Cox model in which each matched pair is a strata, there was no difference between groups (P =.20).

CONCLUSION

Using this retrospective analysis, there does not seem to be any survival benefit to PCV chemotherapy. Future phase III studies for patients with AA may need to consider whether BCNU or PCV is used in the control arm.

摘要

目的

确定间变性星形细胞瘤(AA)患者接受辅助卡莫司汀(BCNU)化疗与丙卡巴肼、洛莫司汀和长春新碱(PCV)化疗后的预后差异。

材料与方法

查阅放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)数据库中根据包含BCNU或PCV辅助化疗方案治疗的新诊断AA患者。所有患者均接受放射治疗。预后分析包括总生存期,同时考虑患者年龄、切除范围、卡诺夫斯基表现状态(KPS)和治疗组(BCNU与PCV)。使用分层和非分层的Cox比例风险模型,以及两组间匹配病例的分析。

结果

根据RTOG方案70 - 18、83 - 02和90 - 06,共有257例患者接受了BCNU治疗;根据RTOG方案94 - 04,175例患者接受了PCV治疗。除KPS外,所有预处理特征在治疗组间分布均衡;BCNU组61%的患者KPS为90至100,而PCV组为73%(P = 0.0075)。在任何年龄组、KPS或手术范围方面,均未观察到生存存在统计学显著差异。分层分析也未显示治疗组有生存改善趋势(P = 0.40)。Cox模型仅确定年龄、KPS和手术范围是影响生存的重要变量,而非治疗组。按年龄、KPS和手术情况在两组间匹配病例,得到133对匹配病例。未观察到生存差异(P = 0.41)。在每个匹配对作为一个分层的Cox模型中,两组间无差异(P = 0.20)。

结论

通过这项回顾性分析,PCV化疗似乎没有任何生存获益。未来针对AA患者的III期研究可能需要考虑在对照臂中使用BCNU还是PCV。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验