Suppr超能文献

正常人类受试者惊吓反应和眨眼反射的预脉冲调制

Prepulse modulation of the startle reaction and the blink reflex in normal human subjects.

作者信息

Valls-Solé J, Valldeoriola F, Molinuevo J L, Cossu G, Nobbe F

机构信息

Unitat d'EMG, Servei de Neurologia, Departament de Medicina, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Villarroel, 170 Barcelona, E-08036 Spain.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 1999 Nov;129(1):49-56. doi: 10.1007/s002210050935.

Abstract

Blink reflexes are usually considered the most representative and consistent response of the auditory startle reaction (ASR), and they are often the only response evaluated in human psychophysiological studies. However, auditory stimuli also induce an auditory blink reflex (ABR), the physiological characteristics and brainstem circuitry of which may be different from those of the ASR. This study aimed to investigate whether there were differences between the orbicularis oculi (OOc) responses elicited with the ABR (OOcABR) and those elicited with the ASR (OOcASR) regarding their behavior to prepulse modulation. For comparison, we also examined the OOc responses to supraorbital nerve stimulation (OOcEBR). Electromyographic responses were simultaneously recorded from the OOc, masseter (MAS) and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles. ABRs were considered when auditory stimuli induced responses limited to the OOc, and ASRs were considered when responses were induced in all muscles recorded from. Prepulse stimuli were either a weak electrical stimulation at the third finger (somatosensory prepulse) or a weak acoustic tone (auditory prepulse) that preceded the response-eliciting stimuli by intervals ranging from 0 to 200 ms. Prepulse effects differed according to prepulse modality, but the OOcABR and the OOcASR were always modulated in the same way. In both responses, somatosensory prepulses induced facilitation from 20 to 50 ms, followed by inhibition beyond 75 ms, and auditory prepulses induced no facilitation but a significant inhibition beyond 30 ms. In the OOcEBR, both somatosensory and acoustic prepulses induced facilitation of R1 and inhibition of R2 beyond 30 ms. Our results suggest that the OOcABR and the OOcASR exhibit the same physiological behavior regarding prepulse modulation. It is hypothesized that prepulse facilitation is due to direct impingement of subthreshold excitatory inputs onto the facial motoneurons while prepulse inhibition results from the engagement of a presynaptic inhibitory circuit in the brainstem.

摘要

瞬目反射通常被认为是听觉惊吓反应(ASR)最具代表性和一致性的反应,并且它们常常是人类心理生理学研究中唯一被评估的反应。然而,听觉刺激也会诱发听觉瞬目反射(ABR),其生理特征和脑干神经回路可能与ASR不同。本研究旨在调查在对预脉冲调制的反应方面,由ABR诱发的眼轮匝肌(OOc)反应(OOcABR)与由ASR诱发的反应(OOcASR)之间是否存在差异。为了进行比较,我们还检查了眼轮匝肌对上眶神经刺激的反应(OOcEBR)。同时从眼轮匝肌、咬肌(MAS)和胸锁乳突肌(SCM)记录肌电图反应。当听觉刺激诱发的反应仅限于眼轮匝肌时,视为ABR;当从所有记录的肌肉中诱发反应时,视为ASR。预脉冲刺激要么是在第三指进行的弱电刺激(体感预脉冲),要么是在诱发反应的刺激之前0至200毫秒范围内的弱音调(听觉预脉冲)。预脉冲效应因预脉冲模式而异,但OOcABR和OOcASR总是以相同的方式被调制。在这两种反应中,体感预脉冲在20至50毫秒时诱发易化,随后在75毫秒之后诱发抑制,而听觉预脉冲在30毫秒之后不诱发易化但诱发显著抑制。在OOcEBR中,体感和听觉预脉冲在30毫秒之后均诱发R1易化和R2抑制。我们的结果表明,OOcABR和OOcASR在预脉冲调制方面表现出相同的生理行为。据推测,预脉冲易化是由于阈下兴奋性输入直接作用于面部运动神经元,而预脉冲抑制是由于脑干中突触前抑制回路的参与。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验