Suppr超能文献

用于门诊手术的鞘内注射罗哌卡因。

Intrathecal ropivacaine for ambulatory surgery.

作者信息

Gautier P E, De Kock M, Van Steenberge A, Poth N, Lahaye-Goffart B, Fanard L, Hody J L

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique Ste. Anne-St. Remi, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1999 Nov;91(5):1239-45. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199911000-00013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rationale of this study was to evaluate intrathecal ropivacaine for ambulatory surgery.

METHODS

One hundred fifty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 scheduled for knee arthroscopy were studied. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 4 ml of one of five isobaric intrathecal solutions: Patients in group 1 (n = 30) received 8 mg of bupivacaine; patients in group 2 (n = 30) received 8 mg ropivacaine; patients in group 3 (n = 30) received 10 mg ropivacaine; patients in group 4 (n = 30) received 12 mg ropivacaine; and patients in group 5 (n = 30) received 14 mg ropivacaine. The level and duration of sensory anesthesia were recorded along with the intensity and duration of motor block. Patients were interviewed to identify transient neurologic symptoms.

RESULTS

Intrathecal ropivacaine 10 mg produced shorter sensory anesthesia and motor blockade than bupivacaine 8mg (152 +/- 44 min and 135 +/- 41 min vs. 181 +/- 44 min and 169 +/- 52 min, mean +/- SD; P < 0.05). However, the quality of intraoperative analgesia was significantly lower in the 10-mg ropivacaine group (P < 0.05). Ropivacaine 12 mg produced sensory and motor block almost comparable to bupivacaine 8 mg. Ropivacaine 14 mg produced sensory and motor block comparable to ropivacaine 12 mg but significantly increased the time to void. No sign of transient radicular irritation were noted.

CONCLUSION

Intrathecal ropivacaine 12 mg is approximately equivalent to bupivacaine 8 mg. At this dose, ropivacaine offers no significant advantage compared with bupivacaine.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估鞘内注射罗哌卡因用于门诊手术的效果。

方法

对150例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为1级、计划行膝关节镜检查的患者进行研究。患者被随机分配接受4毫升五种等比重鞘内溶液中的一种:第1组(n = 30)患者接受8毫克布比卡因;第2组(n = 30)患者接受8毫克罗哌卡因;第3组(n = 30)患者接受10毫克罗哌卡因;第4组(n = 30)患者接受12毫克罗哌卡因;第5组(n = 30)患者接受14毫克罗哌卡因。记录感觉麻醉的平面和持续时间以及运动阻滞的强度和持续时间。对患者进行访谈以确定是否有短暂性神经症状。

结果

鞘内注射10毫克罗哌卡因产生的感觉麻醉和运动阻滞时间比8毫克布比卡因短(分别为152±44分钟和135±41分钟,对比181±44分钟和169±52分钟,均值±标准差;P < 0.05)。然而,10毫克罗哌卡因组术中镇痛质量明显较低(P < 0.05)。12毫克罗哌卡因产生的感觉和运动阻滞几乎与8毫克布比卡因相当。14毫克罗哌卡因产生的感觉和运动阻滞与12毫克罗哌卡因相当,但明显增加了排尿时间。未发现短暂性神经根刺激的迹象。

结论

鞘内注射12毫克罗哌卡因大致相当于8毫克布比卡因。在此剂量下,罗哌卡因与布比卡因相比无明显优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验