Gotoh M, Yoshikawa Y, Kondo A S, Kondo A, Ono Y, Ohshima S
Department of Urology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya City 466-8550, Japan.
World J Urol. 1999 Oct;17(5):274-8. doi: 10.1007/s003450050145.
The prognostic value of pressure-flow study (P-FS) in the surgical treatment of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) was retrospectively studied in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. In 74 patients who underwent surgical treatment for BOO, P-FS and free uroflowmetry were performed pre- and postoperatively. On P-FS, obstruction and detrusor contractility were analyzed according to the Schäfer nomogram. The patients were classified into the following 3 groups according to their preoperative P-FS: group A consisted of 39 patients with normal detrusors and obstruction (obstruction grade 3-6); group B consisted of 13 patients with weak detrusors and obstruction; and group C included 22 patients with weak or very weak detrusors combined with minimal obstruction, if any (obstruction grade 0-2). Postoperatively, the detrusor pressure at maximal flow rate and obstruction grades on P-FS improved significantly in groups A and B but not in group C. The rate of improvement was most prominent in group A, followed by groups B and C. On free uroflowmetry, however, a significant improvement occurred in all three groups with respect to maximal flow rate, average flow rate, and postvoid residue. Moreover, the rate did not differ among the three groups except for the maximal flow rate as determined between groups A and C. Although good detrusor contractility and evident obstruction on analysis of P-FS will guarantee the best surgical outcome, subjects with weak detrusors and minimal obstruction will also have a good outcome by the relief of BOO. In the weak detrusor, P-FS may be limited in diagnosing obstruction and have a low prognostic value, and such patients should not necessarily be excluded from surgical indications.
对良性前列腺增生患者进行回顾性研究,以探讨压力-流率研究(P-FS)在膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)手术治疗中的预后价值。在74例接受BOO手术治疗的患者中,术前和术后均进行了P-FS和自由尿流率测定。根据Schäfer列线图对P-FS的梗阻情况和逼尿肌收缩力进行分析。根据术前P-FS将患者分为以下3组:A组由39例逼尿肌正常且存在梗阻(梗阻分级3-6级)的患者组成;B组由13例逼尿肌功能弱且存在梗阻的患者组成;C组包括22例逼尿肌功能弱或极弱且合并轻微梗阻(如有,梗阻分级0-2级)的患者。术后,A组和B组的最大尿流率时逼尿肌压力和P-FS上的梗阻分级显著改善,而C组未改善。改善率在A组最为显著,其次是B组和C组。然而,在自由尿流率测定方面,三组的最大尿流率、平均尿流率和残余尿量均有显著改善。此外,除A组和C组之间确定的最大尿流率外,三组之间的改善率没有差异。虽然P-FS分析显示逼尿肌收缩力良好且梗阻明显可确保最佳手术效果,但逼尿肌功能弱且梗阻轻微的患者通过解除BOO也会有良好的预后。对于逼尿肌功能弱的患者,P-FS在诊断梗阻方面可能有限,预后价值较低,此类患者不一定应被排除在手术适应症之外。