Alarcón A, Capafons A, Bayot A, Cardeña E
Universitat de Valéncia, Spain.
Am J Clin Hypn. 1999 Jan;41(3):269-76. doi: 10.1080/00029157.1999.10404218.
In a cross-over design (N = 80), we compared the differential liking and preference for two hypnotic techniques involving physical activity: active-alert and waking-alert (or alert-hand) procedures. Participants expressed significantly higher liking and preference for the waking-alert as compared to the active-alert procedure. The latter technique, which also had significantly lower suggestibility scores(Cardeña et al., 1998) was also associated with a significantly higher attrition rate (23%). These significant differences may be explained by the greater physical effort and difficulty associated with the active-alert technique. It seems that the waking-alert method extends the advantages of active hypnosis (e.g., alertness, enhanced self-mastery) to individuals who may dislike or are unable to cope with the greater demands required by the active-alert procedure.
在一项交叉设计（N = 80）中，我们比较了两种涉及身体活动的催眠技术的喜好程度差异和偏好：主动警觉和清醒警觉（或警觉手部）程序。与主动警觉程序相比，参与者对清醒警觉的喜好程度和偏好显著更高。后一种技术的暗示性得分也显著更低（卡德尼亚等人，1998年），其损耗率也显著更高（23%）。这些显著差异可能是由于主动警觉技术带来的更大体力消耗和难度所致。似乎清醒警觉方法将主动催眠的优势（如警觉性、增强自我掌控）扩展到了那些可能不喜欢或无法应对主动警觉程序所要求的更高要求的个体。
