Galindo-Rodriguez G, Aviña-Zubieta J A, Russell A S, Suarez-Almazor M E
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
J Rheumatol. 1999 Nov;26(11):2337-43.
To evaluate the longterm effectiveness of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in an inception cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) seen by rheumatologists.
We performed a retrospective audit of the records of patients with onset of RA between January 1985 and June 1994. Charts were reviewed from the time of diagnosis to the last consult. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression to adjust for potential confounders.
A total of 2296 DMARD therapies were analyzed. Roughly half were started within 2 years of disease onset. By 16 months, 50% of the DMARD therapy courses had been discontinued, and after 4.5 years 75% had been discontinued. Over all, methotrexate (MTX) had the highest probability of continuation. After roughly 3 years 50% of patients were still receiving MTX, compared to one-third of patients who received antimalarials or intramuscular gold, 30% D-penicillamine, 25% sulfasalazine, and 18% oral gold. After 6 years, when considering all DMARD together, only 20% of the therapies had not been discontinued, with no substantial differences between drugs. Toxicity from gold compounds occurred within the first 18 months of therapy and stabilized thereafter. For MTX, withdrawals due to toxicity continued throughout therapy.
This is the largest observational study examining the longterm termination rates of DMARD in patients followed from the time of their initial consult. Our results confirm previous reports of short therapeutic times, even for patients treated early in the course of their disease. MTX appears to be the best drug within the first 5 years of disease. These differences, however, decrease in the longer term. It is unclear whether the results observed for MTX within the first years of therapy translate to better health status in the longer term when compared to other DMARD.
评估改善病情抗风湿药(DMARD)对风湿病专科医生诊治的类风湿关节炎(RA)初发队列患者的长期疗效。
我们对1985年1月至1994年6月期间发病的RA患者的病历进行了回顾性审查。从诊断时起至最后一次会诊对病历进行审查。使用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险回归进行生存分析,以调整潜在的混杂因素。
共分析了2296种DMARD治疗方案。约一半在疾病发作后2年内开始使用。到16个月时,50%的DMARD治疗疗程已停药,4.5年后75%已停药。总体而言,甲氨蝶呤(MTX)持续使用的可能性最高。大约3年后,50%的患者仍在接受MTX治疗,相比之下,接受抗疟药或肌肉注射金制剂的患者为三分之一,接受D-青霉胺的患者为30%,接受柳氮磺胺吡啶的患者为25%,接受口服金制剂的患者为18%。6年后,综合考虑所有DMARD,只有20%的治疗方案未停药,各药物之间无显著差异。金化合物的毒性在治疗的前18个月内出现,此后趋于稳定。对于MTX,因毒性导致的停药在整个治疗过程中持续存在。
这是最大规模的观察性研究,考察了从首次会诊开始随访的患者中DMARD的长期停药率。我们的结果证实了先前关于治疗时间短的报道,即使是在疾病早期接受治疗的患者也是如此。MTX似乎是疾病前5年中最佳的药物。然而,从长期来看,这些差异会减小。与其他DMARD相比,MTX在治疗最初几年观察到的结果是否能转化为长期更好的健康状况尚不清楚。