Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎的生物制剂和口服改善病情抗风湿药物单药治疗。

Biologic and oral disease-modifying antirheumatic drug monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

机构信息

Leeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, , Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Dec;72(12):1897-904. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203485. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

Abstract

Clinical evidence demonstrates coadministration of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) agents and methotrexate (MTX) is more efficacious than administration of TNFi agents alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, leading to the perception that coadministration of MTX with all biologic agents or oral disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is necessary for maximum efficacy. Real-life registry data reveal approximately one-third of patients taking biologic agents use them as monotherapy. Additionally, an analysis of healthcare claims data showed that when MTX was prescribed in conjunction with a biologic agent, as many as 58% of patients did not collect the MTX prescription. Given this discrepancy between perception and real life, we conducted a review of the peer-reviewed literature and rheumatology medical congress abstracts to determine whether data support biologic monotherapy as a treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Our analysis suggests only for tocilizumab is there evidence that the efficacy of biologic monotherapy is comparable with combination therapy with MTX.

摘要

临床证据表明,肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)与甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合用药在类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效优于单独使用 TNFi,这使得人们认为,为了达到最大疗效,所有生物制剂或口服疾病修饰抗风湿药物都需要与 MTX 联合用药。真实世界的登记数据显示,大约三分之一使用生物制剂的患者将其作为单药治疗。此外,一项对医疗保健索赔数据的分析表明,当 MTX 与生物制剂联合使用时,多达 58%的患者没有开 MTX 处方。鉴于这种观念和现实之间的差异,我们对同行评议文献和风湿病医学大会摘要进行了回顾,以确定数据是否支持生物制剂单药治疗作为类风湿关节炎患者的治疗选择。我们的分析表明,只有托珠单抗有证据表明生物制剂单药治疗的疗效与 MTX 联合治疗相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edff/3841743/315574299640/annrheumdis-2013-203485f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验