Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病的短期治疗成本模型:格列吡嗪胃肠治疗系统、二甲双胍和阿卡波糖的比较。

A short-term cost-of-treatment model for type 2 diabetes: comparison of glipizide gastrointestinal therapeutic system, metformin, and acarbose.

作者信息

Ramsdell J W, Grossman J A, Stephens J M, Botteman M F, Arocho R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 1999 Aug;5(8):1007-24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare, from a managed care perspective, the 3-year costs of 3 first-line monotherapy strategies in type 2 diabetes patients: glipizide gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS), metformin, and acarbose.

STUDY DESIGN

A Markov model, with a Monte Carlo simulation, was developed to compare the costs to achieve full glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c of < or = 7%) with each first-line strategy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The patient population for the model was assumed to be all newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients eligible for monotherapy with an oral agent. Each monotherapy could be succeeded by add-on treatments. The model included the costs of routine medical care and supplies, medication, adverse events, and treatment failures.

RESULTS

Using a Monte Carlo simulation, the mean 3-year cumulative costs per patient were $4971, $5273, and $5311 for glipizide GITS, metformin, and acarbose first-line strategies, respectively. The main cost drivers were drug prices. Mean 3-year cost savings for first-line glipizide GITS were $301 over metformin and $340 over acarbose. Between 83% and 85% of all simulations showed cost savings with glipizide GITS compared with the other agents.

CONCLUSIONS

The model suggests first-line monotherapy with glipizide GITS should result in desirable short-term economic benefits for managed care. Because the model incorporates recommended glycemic goals and performed well in sensitivity analyses, it should be applicable to a variety of clinical practices and useful for economic assessments of new therapies. Results of this model should be verified prospectively in typical care settings.

摘要

目的

从管理式医疗的角度比较2型糖尿病患者三种一线单药治疗策略的3年成本:格列吡嗪胃肠治疗系统(GITS)、二甲双胍和阿卡波糖。

研究设计

开发了一个马尔可夫模型,并进行蒙特卡罗模拟,以比较每种一线策略实现完全血糖控制(糖化血红蛋白≤7%)的成本。

患者和方法

模型中的患者群体假定为所有新诊断的适合口服单药治疗的2型糖尿病患者。每种单药治疗后可继以联合治疗。该模型包括常规医疗护理和用品、药物、不良事件及治疗失败的成本。

结果

通过蒙特卡罗模拟,格列吡嗪GITS、二甲双胍和阿卡波糖一线治疗策略的每位患者3年累积平均成本分别为4971美元、5273美元和5311美元。主要成本驱动因素是药品价格。一线格列吡嗪GITS的3年平均成本节省比二甲双胍多301美元,比阿卡波糖多340美元。在所有模拟中,83%至85%的结果显示,与其他药物相比,格列吡嗪GITS可节省成本。

结论

该模型表明,格列吡嗪GITS一线单药治疗应为管理式医疗带来理想的短期经济效益。由于该模型纳入了推荐的血糖目标,且在敏感性分析中表现良好,因此应适用于各种临床实践,并有助于新疗法的经济评估。该模型的结果应在典型的医疗环境中进行前瞻性验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验