• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿卡波糖联合现有治疗方案用于2型糖尿病患者:德国背景下的卫生经济学分析

Acarbose in addition to existing treatments in patients with type 2 diabetes: health economic analysis in a German setting.

作者信息

Roze Stéphane, Valentine William J, Evers Thomas, Palmer Andrew J

机构信息

CORE - Center for Outcomes Research, Binningen, Switzerland.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Jul;22(7):1415-24. doi: 10.1185/030079906X115531.

DOI:10.1185/030079906X115531
PMID:16834840
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A recent retrospective meta-analysis of cardiovascular events from long-term studies with acarbose in type 2 diabetes showed that treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events, supporting the hypothesis that postprandial hyperglycemia is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The aim of the present study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of acarbose, given in addition to existing treatments, in type 2 diabetes patients, based on these findings, in the German setting.

METHODS

The CORE Diabetes Model, a published, validated computer simulation model, was used to project long-term clinical and cost outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients receiving acarbose or placebo in addition to existing treatments. Direct costs were retrieved from published sources and projected over patient lifetimes from a third party payer perspective. Costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 5% annually. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Acarbose treatment was associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy (0.21 years) and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) (0.19 QALYs) but was on average marginally more expensive than treatment in the placebo arm (euro135 per patient). This led to incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of euro633 per life year and euro692 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Sensitivity analysis showed that these findings were robust under variation in a range of assumptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of acarbose to existing treatment was associated with improvements in life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy, and provides excellent value for money over patient lifetimes in the German setting.

摘要

目的

最近一项对2型糖尿病患者使用阿卡波糖的长期研究进行的回顾性荟萃分析表明,该治疗与心血管事件风险的显著降低相关,支持了餐后高血糖是心血管疾病危险因素这一假说。本研究的目的是基于这些发现,在德国的背景下,评估在2型糖尿病患者中,在现有治疗基础上加用阿卡波糖的成本效益。

方法

使用已发表并经验证的计算机模拟模型CORE糖尿病模型,对在现有治疗基础上接受阿卡波糖或安慰剂治疗的2型糖尿病患者的长期临床和成本结局进行预测。直接成本从已发表的资料中获取,并从第三方支付者的角度预测患者的一生。成本和临床效益按每年5%进行贴现。进行了广泛的敏感性分析。

结果

阿卡波糖治疗与贴现预期寿命(0.21年)和质量调整预期寿命(QALE)(0.19个质量调整生命年)的改善相关,但平均而言,其成本略高于安慰剂组治疗(每位患者135欧元)。这导致每获得一个生命年的增量成本效益比为633欧元,每获得一个质量调整生命年的增量成本效益比为692欧元。敏感性分析表明,在一系列假设的变化下,这些发现是稳健的。

结论

在现有治疗基础上加用阿卡波糖与预期寿命和质量调整预期寿命的改善相关,并且在德国的背景下,在患者的一生中提供了优异的性价比。

相似文献

1
Acarbose in addition to existing treatments in patients with type 2 diabetes: health economic analysis in a German setting.阿卡波糖联合现有治疗方案用于2型糖尿病患者:德国背景下的卫生经济学分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Jul;22(7):1415-24. doi: 10.1185/030079906X115531.
2
Cost-effectiveness of switching to biphasic insulin aspart in poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes patients in China.在中国血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者中转换为使用双相门冬胰岛素的成本效益分析
Adv Ther. 2008 Aug;25(8):752-74. doi: 10.1007/s12325-008-0080-4.
3
A cost-effectiveness analysis of pioglitazone plus metformin compared with rosiglitazone plus metformin from a third-party payer perspective in the US.从美国第三方支付者的角度看,吡格列酮加二甲双胍与罗格列酮加二甲双胍的成本效益分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jun;25(6):1343-53. doi: 10.1185/03007990902870084.
4
A health economic analysis of screening and optimal treatment of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension in the USA.美国2型糖尿病和高血压患者肾病筛查及优化治疗的卫生经济学分析
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Apr;23(4):1216-23. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn082.
5
Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for type 2 diabetes patients treated with oral anti-diabetes drugs and with a recent history of monitoring: cost-effectiveness in the US.口服降糖药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者和近期有监测史的自我血糖监测(SMBG):美国的成本效益。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jan;26(1):151-62. doi: 10.1185/03007990903400071.
6
[Cost-effectiveness of the addition of acarbose to the treatment of patients with type-2 diabetes in Spain].
Gac Sanit. 2007 Mar-Apr;21(2):97-104; discussion 105. doi: 10.1157/13101034.
7
What impact would pancreatic beta-cell preservation have on life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy and costs of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes? A projection using the CORE Diabetes Model.胰腺β细胞保护对2型糖尿病患者的预期寿命、质量调整生命预期以及并发症成本会有怎样的影响?使用糖尿病核心模型进行的预测。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Aug;20 Suppl 1:S59-66. doi: 10.1185/030079904X2024.
8
Therapy conversion to biphasic insulin aspart 30 improves long-term outcomes and reduces the costs of type 2 diabetes in Saudi Arabia.转换为门冬胰岛素 30 双相疗法可改善沙特阿拉伯 2 型糖尿病患者的长期治疗效果并降低治疗成本。
J Med Econ. 2008;11(4):651-70. doi: 10.3111/13696990802589122.
9
Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes using a basal-bolus regimen in five European countries.在五个欧洲国家中,使用基础-餐时胰岛素方案的 1 型糖尿病患者中,地特胰岛素对比中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2009 Jun;12(2):114-23. doi: 10.3111/13696990903080344.
10
Long-term cost-effectiveness of pioglitazone versus placebo in addition to existing diabetes treatment: a US analysis based on PROactive.吡格列酮与安慰剂相比,在现有糖尿病治疗基础上的长期成本效益:基于PROactive研究的美国分析。
Value Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00403.x. Epub 2008 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypoglycemic Effects of Extracts Obtained from Endemic Degen and Neič.从地方植物德根和内奇中提取的提取物的降血糖作用
Plants (Basel). 2024 May 18;13(10):1406. doi: 10.3390/plants13101406.
2
How Consistent is the Relationship between Improved Glucose Control and Modelled Health Outcomes for People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus? a Systematic Review.2型糖尿病患者血糖控制改善与模拟健康结局之间的关系有多一致?一项系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Mar;35(3):319-329. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0466-0.
3
Comparison of acarbose and voglibose in diabetes patients who are inadequately controlled with basal insulin treatment: randomized, parallel, open-label, active-controlled study.
阿卡波糖与伏格列波糖治疗基础胰岛素控制不佳的糖尿病患者的比较:随机、平行、开放标签、阳性对照研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Jan;29(1):90-7. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.1.90. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
4
α-Glucosidase inhibitors and their use in clinical practice.α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂及其在临床实践中的应用。
Arch Med Sci. 2012 Nov 9;8(5):899-906. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2012.31621. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
5
Cost of clinical events in health economic evaluations in Germany: a systematic review.德国健康经济评估中临床事件的成本:系统评价。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2012 May 31;10(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-10-7.