• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

居家护理的目标:治疗性、代偿性,还是二者兼具?

Goals of home care: therapeutic, compensatory, either, or both?

作者信息

Kane R A

机构信息

Division of Health Services Research & Policy, School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Aging Health. 1999 Aug;11(3):299-321. doi: 10.1177/089826439901100303.

DOI:10.1177/089826439901100303
PMID:10558588
Abstract

This article classifies home care goals into two broad categories: therapeutic goals, in which home care providers strive for measurable improvement on parameters of physical, psychological, or social functioning and compensatory (or empowering) goals, in which home care providers strive to provide services to compensate for functional impairment, thus enabling consumers to pursue their own goals. Therapeutic goals are loosely associated with "medical models" of care and compensatory goals with "social models." From a consumer perspective therapeutic and compensatory goals are important, and artificial distinctions between the two should be eliminated. However, this merger should be effected in such a way that therapeutic approaches can be incorporated into programs with relatively low unit costs.

摘要

本文将居家护理目标分为两大类

治疗性目标,即居家护理提供者力求在身体、心理或社会功能参数方面取得可衡量的改善;以及补偿性(或赋能性)目标,即居家护理提供者力求提供服务以弥补功能障碍,从而使消费者能够追求自身目标。治疗性目标与护理的“医学模式”联系较为松散,补偿性目标则与“社会模式”相关。从消费者角度来看,治疗性目标和补偿性目标都很重要,应消除两者之间人为的区分。然而,这种合并应以能够将治疗方法纳入单位成本相对较低的项目的方式来实现。

相似文献

1
Goals of home care: therapeutic, compensatory, either, or both?居家护理的目标:治疗性、代偿性,还是二者兼具?
J Aging Health. 1999 Aug;11(3):299-321. doi: 10.1177/089826439901100303.
2
Examining the efficiency of home care.考察居家护理的效率。
J Aging Health. 1999 Aug;11(3):322-40. doi: 10.1177/089826439901100304.
3
A normative analysis of home care goals.家庭护理目标的规范性分析
J Aging Health. 1999 Aug;11(3):445-68. doi: 10.1177/089826439901100309.
4
Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.面向医疗保险人群的远程医疗:儿科、产科及临床医生间接居家干预措施
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001 Aug(24 Suppl):1-32.
5
Comparing consumer-directed and agency models for providing supportive services at home.比较在家提供支持性服务的消费者导向模式和机构模式。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Apr;35(1 Pt 2):351-66.
6
The interests of three stakeholders in independent personal care for disabled elders.残疾老年人独立个人护理中三个利益相关者的利益。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2000 Fall;23(2):136-60.
7
Consumer-directed home and community services programs in eight states: policy issues for older people and government.八个州的消费者导向型家庭和社区服务项目:老年人与政府面临的政策问题
J Aging Soc Policy. 2001;12(4):1-26. doi: 10.1300/J031v12n04_01.
8
The Station Community Mental Health Centre Inc: nurturing and empowering.车站社区心理健康中心有限公司:关怀与赋能。
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Jul-Sep;10(3):1411. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
9
[Home care services. An economic and social necessity].[居家护理服务。一项经济和社会的必需需求]
Krankenpfl Soins Infirm. 1984 Oct;77(10):62-4.
10
Consumer choice in home- and community-based long-term care: policy implications for decisionally incapacitated consumers.家庭和社区长期护理中的消费者选择:对无行为能力消费者的政策影响
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2001;19(4):17-50. doi: 10.1300/J027v19n04_02.

引用本文的文献

1
Beware of Data Gaps in Home Care Research: The Streetlight Effect and Its Implications for Policy Making on Long-Term Services and Supports.谨防家庭护理研究中的数据缺口:路灯效应及其对长期服务与支持政策制定的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2015 Oct;72(5):622-40. doi: 10.1177/1077558715588437. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
2
Formal home care utilization patterns by rural-urban community residence.城乡社区居民的正式家庭护理使用模式。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Mar;64(2):258-68. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbn003. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
3
How state-funded home care programs respond to changes in Medicare home health care: resource allocation decisions on the front line.
政府资助的居家护理项目如何应对医疗保险居家医疗保健的变化:一线资源分配决策
Health Serv Res. 2003 Oct;38(5):1263-81. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00176.
4
Strengthening research to improve the practice and management of long-term care.加强研究以改善长期护理的实践与管理。
Milbank Q. 2003;81(2):179-220, 171. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00051.