• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Public and private responsibilities: home- and community-based services in the United Kingdom and Germany.

作者信息

Wiener J M, Cuellar A E

机构信息

Urban Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Aging Health. 1999 Aug;11(3):417-44. doi: 10.1177/089826439901100308.

DOI:10.1177/089826439901100308
PMID:10558593
Abstract

In the late 1980s, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany had roughly the same system of financing and delivering long-term care. In contrast to the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany enacted radical reform. The United Kingdom converted an open-ended, means-tested national entitlement for institutional care to a block grant to local governments, whereas Germany enacted a nationally uniform, non-means-tested social insurance program. This article analyzes the postreform experience of the United Kingdom and Germany with respect to issues of financing, assessment and case management, and the availability of home- and community-based services. Policy implications for the United States are developed.

摘要

相似文献

1
Public and private responsibilities: home- and community-based services in the United Kingdom and Germany.
J Aging Health. 1999 Aug;11(3):417-44. doi: 10.1177/089826439901100308.
2
The context for health reform in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, and the United States.英国、瑞典、德国和美国医疗改革的背景。
Health Policy. 1997 Sep;41 Suppl:S9-26. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00050-x.
3
Can social insurance for long-term care work? The experience of Germany.长期护理社会保险能发挥作用吗?德国的经验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 May-Jun;19(3):8-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.8.
4
The Impact of the Great Recession on Long-Term Services and Supports in the United States and England.《大衰退对美国和英国长期服务和支持的影响》。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jan-Feb;32(1):15-30. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1563470. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
5
Case management: an American's observations of community care in Britain.病例管理:一位美国人对英国社区护理的观察
J Case Manag. 1997 Fall;6(3):88-95.
6
Home care in old age: a lost cause?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1992 Winter;17(4):879-98. doi: 10.1215/03616878-17-4-879.
7
Residential care for the elderly.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1992 Winter;17(4):929-57. doi: 10.1215/03616878-17-4-929.
8
Long-term care: funding of long-term care. Issue brief.长期护理:长期护理的资金筹集。问题简报。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2012 Dec 31:1-46.
9
United Kingdom (England): Health system review.英国(英格兰):卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2011;13(1):1-483, xix-xx.
10
Long-term care: funding of long-term care.长期护理:长期护理的资金筹集
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2013:1-67.