• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大剂量环磷酰胺后三种细胞因子方案的比较效果:粒细胞集落刺激因子、粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)以及白细胞介素-3与GM-CSF序贯治疗。

Comparative effects of three cytokine regimens after high-dose cyclophosphamide: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and sequential interleukin-3 and GM-CSF.

作者信息

Ballestrero A, Ferrando F, Garuti A, Basta P, Gonella R, Stura P, Mela G S, Sessarego M, Gobbi M, Patrone F

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1999 Apr;17(4):1296. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1296.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1296
PMID:10561192
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the toxicity and effects on hematologic recovery and circulating progenitor cell mobilization of three cytokine regimens administered after high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX; 6 g/m(2)), given as the first step of a high-dose sequential chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were randomized to receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone (arm 1), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) alone (arm 2), or sequential interleukin-3 (IL-3) and GM-CSF (arm 3). Cytokines were administered as a single daily subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 to 6 microg/kg/d. Progenitor cells were evaluated in peripheral blood as well as in apheretic product as both CD34(+) cells and granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM).

RESULTS

Neutrophil recovery was faster in arm 1 as compared with arms 2 and 3 (P <.0001); no significant differences were observed between arms 2 and 3. In arm 3, a moderate acceleration of platelet recovery was observed, but it was statistically significant only as compared with arm 1 (P =.028). The peak of CD34(+) cells was hastened in a median of 2 days in arm 1 compared with arms 2 and 3 (P =.0002), whereas the median peak value of CD34(+) cells and CFU-GM was similar in the three patient groups. Administration of IL-3 and GM-CSF resulted in more significant toxicity requiring pharmacologic treatment in 90% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The three cytokine regimens administered after HD-CTX are comparably effective in reducing hematologic toxicity and mobilizing the hematopoietic progenitor cells. G-CSF accelerates leukocyte recovery and progenitor mobilization. Although G-CSF-treated patients have somewhat slower platelet recovery, they definitely have fewer side effects.

摘要

目的

比较三种细胞因子方案在大剂量环磷酰胺(HD-CTX;6 g/m²)作为大剂量序贯化疗第一步给药后,对毒性、血液学恢复及循环祖细胞动员的影响。

患者与方法

48例乳腺癌或非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者被随机分为三组,分别接受单独使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)(第1组)、单独使用粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)(第2组)或序贯使用白细胞介素-3(IL-3)和GM-CSF(第3组)。细胞因子通过每日一次皮下注射给药,剂量为5至6 μg/kg/d。在外周血以及采集的产品中评估祖细胞,检测指标包括CD34⁺细胞和粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落形成单位(CFU-GM)。

结果

与第2组和第3组相比,第1组中性粒细胞恢复更快(P <.0001);第2组和第3组之间未观察到显著差异。在第3组中,观察到血小板恢复有适度加速,但仅与第1组相比有统计学意义(P =.028)。与第2组和第3组相比,第1组CD34⁺细胞峰值提前中位2天出现(P =.0002),而三组患者中CD34⁺细胞和CFU-GM的中位峰值相似。IL-3和GM-CSF的联合使用导致更显著的毒性,90%的患者需要药物治疗。

结论

HD-CTX后给予的三种细胞因子方案在降低血液学毒性和动员造血祖细胞方面效果相当。G-CSF可加速白细胞恢复和祖细胞动员。虽然接受G-CSF治疗的患者血小板恢复稍慢,但副作用明显较少。

相似文献

1
Comparative effects of three cytokine regimens after high-dose cyclophosphamide: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and sequential interleukin-3 and GM-CSF.大剂量环磷酰胺后三种细胞因子方案的比较效果:粒细胞集落刺激因子、粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)以及白细胞介素-3与GM-CSF序贯治疗。
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Apr;17(4):1296. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1296.
2
Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose cyclophosphamide cancer therapy.大剂量环磷酰胺癌症治疗后粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子与粒细胞集落刺激因子的比较效果
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Feb;14(2):628-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.2.628.
3
Prospective, randomized trial of sequential interleukin-3 and granulocyte- or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after standard-dose chemotherapy in cancer patients.癌症患者在接受标准剂量化疗后序贯使用白细胞介素-3和粒细胞或粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子的前瞻性随机试验。
Haematologica. 1999 Nov;84(11):1016-23.
4
Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide in combination with G-CSF, GM-CSF, or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a randomized prospective study.环磷酰胺联合粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)、粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)或序贯GM-CSF/G-CSF用于非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者外周血干细胞动员:一项随机前瞻性研究
J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2000 Oct;9(5):737-48. doi: 10.1089/15258160050196786.
5
Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF.祖细胞动员的随机交叉试验:大剂量环磷酰胺加粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)与粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子加G-CSF的比较
J Clin Oncol. 2000 May;18(9):1824-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.9.1824.
6
Sequential interleukin-3 and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prior to and following high-dose etoposide and cyclophosphamide: a phase I/II trial.大剂量依托泊苷和环磷酰胺治疗前后序贯使用白细胞介素-3和粒细胞集落刺激因子:一项I/II期试验
Clin Cancer Res. 1997 Sep;3(9):1519-26.
7
Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.粒细胞集落刺激因子与粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子联合强化化疗用于多发性骨髓瘤外周血干细胞动员和自体移植的随机对照研究
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004 Jun;10(6):395-404. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2004.02.001.
8
A phase I study of sequential versus concurrent interleukin-3 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in advanced breast cancer patients treated with FLAC (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy.一项针对接受FLAC(5-氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙、阿霉素、环磷酰胺)化疗的晚期乳腺癌患者,对比序贯与同步使用白细胞介素-3和粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子的I期研究。
Blood. 1995 Oct 15;86(8):2913-21.
9
Comparison of four cytokine regimens for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells: IL-3 alone and combined with GM-CSF or G-CSF.四种细胞因子方案动员外周血干细胞的比较:单独使用白细胞介素-3以及与粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子或粒细胞集落刺激因子联合使用。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996 Feb;17(2):179-83.
10
Proliferative response of human marrow myeloid progenitor cells to in vivo treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone and in combination with interleukin-3 after autologous bone marrow transplantation.自体骨髓移植后,人骨髓髓系祖细胞对单独使用粒细胞集落刺激因子以及联合白细胞介素-3进行体内治疗的增殖反应。
Exp Hematol. 1995 Dec;23(14):1520-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Interleukin-3 coordinates glial-peripheral immune crosstalk to incite multiple sclerosis.白细胞介素-3 协调神经胶质-外周免疫串扰以引发多发性硬化症。
Immunity. 2023 Jul 11;56(7):1502-1514.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 May 8.
2
Targeting stem cell niches and trafficking for cardiovascular therapy.靶向干细胞龛位及其归巢用于心血管治疗。
Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jan;129(1):62-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
3
Lack of dendritic cell mobilization into the peripheral blood of cancer patients following standard- or high-dose chemotherapy plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor.
标准剂量或高剂量化疗加粒细胞集落刺激因子后,癌症患者外周血中树突状细胞动员不足。
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2003 Jun;52(6):359-66. doi: 10.1007/s00262-002-0365-4. Epub 2003 Mar 27.