文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

环磷酰胺联合粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)、粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)或序贯GM-CSF/G-CSF用于非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者外周血干细胞动员:一项随机前瞻性研究

Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide in combination with G-CSF, GM-CSF, or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a randomized prospective study.

作者信息

Gazitt Y, Callander N, Freytes C O, Shaughnessy P, Liu Q, Tsai T W, Devore P

机构信息

University of Texas, Health Science Center, Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital, San Antonio 78284, USA.

出版信息

J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2000 Oct;9(5):737-48. doi: 10.1089/15258160050196786.


DOI:10.1089/15258160050196786
PMID:11091498
Abstract

We designed a randomized, prospective three-arm mobilization study to determine the kinetics of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in 60 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients primed with cyclophosphamide (CTX) in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (arm A), granulocyte-macrophage (GM)-CSF (arm B) or GM-CSF/G-CSF (arm C). We also compared mobilization and transplant-related toxicities, pre- and post-transplant support and the probability of survival among the three arms. To date, 35 patients have been enrolled in the study; 13 patients have been enrolled in arm A, 10 patients in arm B, and 13 patients in arm C. Successful collection of the target of > or = 2 X 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in one to four apheresis collections was 10/13, 6/10, and 7/12 in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The differences between arms were not statistically significant. The median time to achieve the target CD34+ cells in patients who successfully mobilized the target CD34+ cells was 3 days, 2 days, and 1 day, in patients in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The time for neutrophil engraftment was 11, 10, and 10 days in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The time for platelet engraftment was 11 days for patients in all arms of the study. Most importantly, no significant differences were observed among the three arms in the duration of neutropenic fever, the extent of mucositis, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting, or in the number of units of platelets or red cells transfused after transplantation. Risk factors associated with poor mobilization were > or = 3 regimens of chemotherapy prior to mobilization, older age, and disease histology (follicular versus diffuse). Therefore, we conclude that the type of growth factor used for mobilization did not play a major role in the outcome of mobilization and recommend mobilizing NHL patients before they receive multiple regimens of chemotherapy.

摘要

我们设计了一项随机、前瞻性三臂动员研究,以确定60例接受环磷酰胺(CTX)联合粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)预处理的非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者(A组)、粒细胞-巨噬细胞(GM)-CSF预处理的患者(B组)或GM-CSF/G-CSF预处理的患者(C组)外周血干细胞(PBSC)动员的动力学情况。我们还比较了三组之间的动员情况、移植相关毒性、移植前后的支持治疗以及生存概率。迄今为止,已有35例患者入组该研究;A组入组13例患者,B组入组10例患者,C组入组13例患者。在一至四次单采中成功采集到≥2×10⁶个CD34⁺细胞/kg目标的比例,A组为10/13,B组为6/10,C组为7/12。三组之间的差异无统计学意义。成功动员出目标CD34⁺细胞的患者达到目标CD34⁺细胞的中位时间,A组为3天,B组为2天,C组为1天。中性粒细胞植入时间,A组为11天,B组为10天,C组为10天。研究所有组患者的血小板植入时间均为11天。最重要的是,三组在中性粒细胞减少性发热持续时间、黏膜炎程度、腹泻、恶心/呕吐情况,或移植后输注血小板或红细胞的单位数量方面均未观察到显著差异。与动员效果不佳相关的危险因素为动员前≥3种化疗方案、年龄较大以及疾病组织学类型(滤泡型与弥漫型)。因此,我们得出结论,用于动员的生长因子类型在动员结果中未起主要作用,并建议在NHL患者接受多种化疗方案之前进行动员。

相似文献

[1]
Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide in combination with G-CSF, GM-CSF, or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a randomized prospective study.

J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2000-10

[2]
No polarization of type 1 or type 2 precursor dendritic cells in peripheral blood stem cell collections of non-hodgkin's lymphoma patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF, GM-CSF, or GM-CSF followed by G-CSF.

Stem Cells Dev. 2006-4

[3]
Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF.

J Clin Oncol. 2000-5

[4]
Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004-6

[5]
Differential mobilization of CD34+ cells and lymphoma cells in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients mobilized with different growth factors.

J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2001-2

[6]
Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.

Transfusion. 2011-3-10

[7]
Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001-5

[8]
Comparative effects of three cytokine regimens after high-dose cyclophosphamide: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and sequential interleukin-3 and GM-CSF.

J Clin Oncol. 1999-4

[9]
Randomized comparison of G-CSF + GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells: effects on hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy.

Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997-12

[10]
GM-CSF versus G-CSF: engraftment characteristics, resource utilization, and cost following autologous PBSC transplantation.

Cytotherapy. 2002

引用本文的文献

[1]
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Treatment Before Radiotherapy Protects Against Radiation-Induced Liver Disease in Mice.

Front Pharmacol. 2021-11-15

[2]
Bendamustine, etoposide and dexamethasone to mobilize peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma.

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016-10

[3]
Increased mobilization and yield of stem cells using plerixafor in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma.

Stem Cells Cloning. 2011-2-27

[4]
Proposed definition of 'poor mobilizer' in lymphoma and multiple myeloma: an analytic hierarchy process by ad hoc working group Gruppo ItalianoTrapianto di Midollo Osseo.

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011-5-30

[5]
Low doses of GM-CSF (molgramostim) and G-CSF (filgrastim) after cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) enhance the peripheral blood progenitor cell harvest: results of two randomized studies including 120 patients.

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索