多西他赛与阿霉素治疗转移性乳腺癌患者的前瞻性随机试验。
Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
作者信息
Chan S, Friedrichs K, Noel D, Pintér T, Van Belle S, Vorobiof D, Duarte R, Gil Gil M, Bodrogi I, Murray E, Yelle L, von Minckwitz G, Korec S, Simmonds P, Buzzi F, González Mancha R, Richardson G, Walpole E, Ronzoni M, Murawsky M, Alakl M, Riva A, Crown J
机构信息
Department of Clinical Oncology, City Hospital, Nottingham, and CRC Wessex Medical Oncology Unit, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom.
出版信息
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Aug;17(8):2341-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2341.
PURPOSE
This phase III study compared docetaxel and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received previous alkylating agent-containing chemotherapy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) or doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for a maximum of seven treatment cycles.
RESULTS
A total of 326 patients were randomized, 165 to receive doxorubicin and 161 to receive docetaxel. Overall, docetaxel produced a significantly higher rate of objective response than did doxorubicin (47.8% v 33.3%; P =.008). Docetaxel was also significantly more active than doxorubicin in patients with negative prognostic factors, such as visceral metastases (objective response, 46% v 29%) and resistance to prior chemotherapy (47% v 25%). Median time to progression was longer in the docetaxel group (26 weeks v 21 weeks; difference not significant). Median overall survival was similar in the two groups (docetaxel, 15 months; doxorubicin, 14 months). There was one death due to infection in each group, and an additional four deaths due to cardiotoxicity in the doxorubicin group. Although neutropenia was similar in both groups, febrile neutropenia and severe infection occurred more frequently in the doxorubicin group. For severe nonhematologic toxicity, the incidences of cardiac toxicity, nausea, vomiting, and stomatitis were higher among patients receiving doxorubicin, whereas diarrhea, neuropathy, fluid retention, and skin and nail changes were higher among patients receiving docetaxel.
CONCLUSION
The observed differences in activity and toxicity profiles provide a basis for therapy choice and confirms the rationale for combination studies in early breast cancer.
目的
本III期研究比较了多西他赛和阿霉素在既往接受过含烷化剂化疗的转移性乳腺癌患者中的疗效。
患者与方法
患者被随机分为两组,一组每3周静脉输注多西他赛100mg/m²,另一组每3周静脉输注阿霉素75mg/m²,最多进行7个治疗周期。
结果
共有326例患者被随机分组,165例接受阿霉素治疗,161例接受多西他赛治疗。总体而言,多西他赛产生的客观缓解率显著高于阿霉素(47.8%对33.3%;P = 0.008)。在具有阴性预后因素的患者中,如内脏转移(客观缓解率,46%对29%)和对既往化疗耐药(47%对25%),多西他赛也比阿霉素显著更具活性。多西他赛组的中位疾病进展时间更长(26周对21周;差异不显著)。两组的中位总生存期相似(多西他赛组为15个月;阿霉素组为14个月)。每组各有1例因感染死亡,阿霉素组另有4例因心脏毒性死亡。虽然两组的中性粒细胞减少情况相似,但发热性中性粒细胞减少和严重感染在阿霉素组中更频繁发生。对于严重的非血液学毒性,接受阿霉素治疗的患者中心脏毒性、恶心、呕吐和口腔炎的发生率更高,而接受多西他赛治疗的患者中腹泻、神经病变、液体潴留以及皮肤和指甲改变的发生率更高。
结论
观察到的活性和毒性特征差异为治疗选择提供了依据,并证实了早期乳腺癌联合研究的合理性。