Lenz F A, Jaeger C J, Seike M S, Lin Y C, Reich S G, DeLong M R, Vitek J L
Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, 21287-7713, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Nov;82(5):2372-92. doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.5.2372.
Indirect evidence suggests that the thalamus contributes to abnormal movements occurring in patients with dystonia (dystonia patients). The present study tested the hypothesis that thalamic activity contributes to the dystonic movements that occur in such patients. During these movements, spectral analysis of electromyographic (EMG) signals in flexor and extensor muscles of the wrist and elbow exhibited peak EMG power in the lowest frequency band [0-0.78 Hz (mean: 0.39 Hz) dystonia frequency] for 60-85% of epochs studied during a pointing task. Normal controls showed low-frequency peaks for <16% of epochs during pointing. Among dystonia patients, simultaneous contraction of antagonistic muscles (cocontraction) at dystonia frequency during pointing was observed for muscles acting about the wrist (63% of epochs) and elbow (39%), but cocontraction was not observed among normal controls during pointing. Thalamic neuronal signals were recorded during thalamotomy for treatment of dystonia and were compared with those of control patients without motor abnormality who were undergoing thalamic procedures for treatment of chronic pain. Presumed nuclear boundaries of a human thalamic cerebellar relay nucleus (ventral intermediate, Vim) and a pallidal relay nucleus (ventral oral posterior, Vop) were estimated by aligning the anterior border of the principal sensory nucleus (ventral caudal, Vc) with the region where the majority of cells have cutaneous receptive fields (RFs). The ratio of power at dystonia frequency to average spectral power was >2 (P < 0.001) for cells in presumed Vop often for dystonia patients (81%) but never for control patients. The percentage of such cells in presumed Vim of dystonia patients (32%) was not significantly different from that of controls (31%). Many cells in presumed Vop exhibited dystonia frequency activity that was correlated with and phase-advanced on EMG activity during dystonia, suggesting that this activity was related to dystonia. Thalamic somatic sensory activity also differed between dystonia patients and controls. The percentage of cells responding to passive joint movement or to manipulation of subcutaneous structures (deep sensory cells) in presumed Vim was significantly greater in patients with dystonia than in control patients undergoing surgery for treatment of pain or tremor. Dystonia patients had a significantly higher proportion of deep sensory cells responding to movement of more than one joint (26%, 13/52) than did "control" patients (8%, 4/49). Deep sensory cells in patients with dystonia were located in thalamic maps that demonstrated increased representations of parts of the body affected by dystonia. Thus dystonia patients showed increased receptive fields and an increased thalamic representation of dystonic body parts. The motor activity of an individual sensory cell was related to the sensory activity of that cell by identification of the muscle apparently involved in the cell's receptive field. Specifically, we defined the effector muscle as the muscle that, by contraction, produced the joint movement associated with a thalamic neuronal sensory discharge, when the examiner passively moved the joint. Spike X EMG correlation functions during dystonia indicated that thalamic cellular activity less often was related to EMG in effector muscles (52%) than in other muscles (86%). Thus there is a mismatch between the effector muscle for a thalamic cell and the muscles with EMG correlated with activity of that cell during dystonia. This mismatch may result from the reorganization of sensory maps and may contribute to the simultaneous activation of multiple muscles observed in dystonia. Microstimulation in presumed Vim in dystonia patients produced simultaneous contraction of multiple forearm muscles, similar to the simultaneous muscle contractions observed in dystonia. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
间接证据表明,丘脑与肌张力障碍患者(肌张力障碍患者)出现的异常运动有关。本研究检验了以下假设:丘脑活动与此类患者出现的肌张力障碍性运动有关。在这些运动过程中,对腕部和肘部屈肌和伸肌的肌电图(EMG)信号进行频谱分析,结果显示,在指向任务期间所研究的60 - 85%的时间段内,最低频段[0 - 0.78 Hz(平均:0.39 Hz)肌张力障碍频率]出现肌电图功率峰值。正常对照组在指向过程中,<16%的时间段出现低频峰值。在肌张力障碍患者中,指向过程中,腕部(63%的时间段)和肘部(39%)周围肌肉在肌张力障碍频率下拮抗肌同时收缩(共同收缩),但正常对照组在指向过程中未观察到共同收缩。在治疗肌张力障碍的丘脑切开术中记录丘脑神经元信号,并与因慢性疼痛接受丘脑手术的无运动异常的对照患者的信号进行比较。通过将主要感觉核(腹侧尾核,Vc)的前缘与大多数细胞具有皮肤感受野(RFs)的区域对齐,估计人类丘脑小脑中继核(腹侧中间核,Vim)和苍白球中继核(腹侧口后核,Vop)的假定核边界。对于通常为肌张力障碍患者(81%)但对照患者从未出现的假定Vop中的细胞,肌张力障碍频率下的功率与平均频谱功率之比>2(P < 0.001)。肌张力障碍患者假定Vim中此类细胞的百分比(32%)与对照组(31%)无显著差异。假定Vop中的许多细胞表现出肌张力障碍频率活动,该活动与肌张力障碍期间的肌电图活动相关且相位超前,表明这种活动与肌张力障碍有关。肌张力障碍患者和对照组之间的丘脑躯体感觉活动也存在差异。与接受疼痛或震颤治疗手术的对照患者相比,肌张力障碍患者假定Vim中对被动关节运动或皮下结构操作有反应的细胞(深部感觉细胞)百分比显著更高。肌张力障碍患者中对多个关节运动有反应的深部感觉细胞比例(26%,13/52)明显高于“对照”患者(8%,4/49)。肌张力障碍患者的深部感觉细胞位于丘脑图谱中,这些图谱显示受肌张力障碍影响的身体部位的表征增加。因此,肌张力障碍患者表现出感受野增加以及肌张力障碍身体部位的丘脑表征增加。通过识别明显参与细胞感受野的肌肉,单个感觉细胞的运动活动与其感觉活动相关。具体而言,当检查者被动移动关节时,我们将效应肌定义为通过收缩产生与丘脑神经元感觉放电相关的关节运动的肌肉。肌张力障碍期间的动作电位X肌电图相关函数表明,丘脑细胞活动与效应肌中肌电图相关的频率(52%)低于其他肌肉(86%)。因此,在肌张力障碍期间,丘脑细胞的效应肌与肌电图与该细胞活动相关的肌肉之间存在不匹配。这种不匹配可能是由于感觉图谱的重组导致的,并且可能导致在肌张力障碍中观察到的多块肌肉同时激活。对肌张力障碍患者假定Vim进行微刺激会导致多块前臂肌肉同时收缩,类似于在肌张力障碍中观察到的同时肌肉收缩。(摘要截断)