Iddon J L, Pickard J D, Cross J J, Griffiths P D, Czosnyka M, Sahakian B J
Department of Psychiatry, MRC Cambridge Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, UK.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;67(6):723-32. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.67.6.723.
Eleven patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) were selected from an initial cohort of 43 patients. The patients with NPH fell into two distinctive subgroups: preshunt, group 1 (n=5) scored less than 24 on the mini mental state examination (MMSE) and were classified as demented and group 2 (n=6) scored 24 or above on the MMSE and were classified as non-demented.
All patients were neuropsychologically assessed on two occasions: preshunt and then again 6 months postshunt. Group 1 completed the mini mental state examination (MMSE) and the Kendrick object learning test (KOLT). In addition to the MMSE and KOLT, group 2 completed further tasks including verbal fluency and memory and attentional tasks from the CANTAB battery. Nine of the 11 patients also underwent postshunt MRI.
Group 1, who, preshunt, performed in the dementing range on both the MMSE and KOLT, showed a significant postoperative recovery, with all patients now scoring within the normal non-demented range. Group 2, although showing no signs of dementia according to the MMSE and KOLT either preshunt or postshunt, did show a specific pattern of impairment on tests sensitive to frontostriatal dysfunction compared with healthy volunteers, and this pattern remained postoperatively. Importantly, this pattern is distinct from that exhibited by patients with mild Alzheimer's disease. Eight of the nine patterns of structural damage corresponded well to cognitive performance.
These findings are useful for three main reasons: (1) they detail the structural and functional profile of impairment seen in NPH, (2) they demonstrate the heterogeneity found in this population and show how severity of initial cognitive impairment can affect outcome postshunt, and (3) they may inform and provide a means of monitoring the cognitive outcome of new procedures in shunt surgery.
从43例患者的初始队列中选取11例特发性正常压力脑积水(NPH)患者。NPH患者分为两个不同的亚组:分流术前,第1组(n = 5)在简易精神状态检查(MMSE)中得分低于24分,被归类为痴呆;第2组(n = 6)在MMSE中得分24分或以上,被归类为非痴呆。
所有患者均接受两次神经心理学评估:分流术前一次,分流术后6个月再进行一次。第1组完成简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和肯德里克物体学习测试(KOLT)。除MMSE和KOLT外,第2组还完成了进一步的任务,包括言语流畅性、记忆和来自剑桥神经心理测试自动化成套系统(CANTAB)的注意力任务。11例患者中有9例还接受了分流术后的磁共振成像(MRI)检查。
第1组在分流术前MMSE和KOLT的表现均处于痴呆范围,术后显示出显著恢复,所有患者目前得分均在正常非痴呆范围内。第2组虽然在分流术前或术后根据MMSE和KOLT均未显示痴呆迹象,但与健康志愿者相比,在对额纹状体功能障碍敏感的测试中确实表现出特定的损伤模式,且这种模式在术后仍然存在。重要的是,这种模式与轻度阿尔茨海默病患者表现出的模式不同。9例结构损伤模式中有8例与认知表现良好对应。
这些发现有三个主要用途:(1)详细描述了NPH中所见损伤的结构和功能概况;(2)证明了该人群中存在的异质性,并显示了初始认知障碍的严重程度如何影响分流术后的结果;(3)可为监测分流手术新程序的认知结果提供信息和手段。