Byard R, Krous H
State Forensic Science Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
J Paediatr Child Health. 1999 Oct;35(5):432-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.1999.355423.x.
Given that the diagnosis of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) remains one of exclusion, problems still exist in distinguishing possible cases from those where the deaths were due to accidental or inflicted suffocation. The term 'SIDS' cannot be used unless a complete autopsy examination has been performed, augmented by review of the clinical history and examination of the death scene. In the absence of a cause of death, a more suitable designation in the presence of inflicted injury is 'undetermined' rather than 'SIDS'. Use of standard autopsy and death scene protocols that have been endorsed by professional bodies will improve the investigation of unexpected infant death and will increase the likelihood of diagnosing subtle disorders that may be confused with SIDS.
鉴于婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)的诊断仍然是一种排除性诊断,在区分可能的病例与因意外或故意窒息导致死亡的病例方面仍然存在问题。除非已经进行了完整的尸体解剖检查,并辅以临床病史回顾和死亡现场检查,否则不能使用“SIDS”这一术语。在没有死因的情况下,如果存在故意伤害,更合适的名称是“死因未明”而非“SIDS”。采用专业机构认可的标准尸体解剖和死亡现场规程将改善对意外婴儿死亡的调查,并增加诊断出可能与SIDS混淆的细微病症的可能性。