Krous Henry F, Haas Elisabeth A, Masoumi Homeyra, Chadwick Amy E, Stanley Christina
Department of Pathology, Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego, 3020 Children's Way, MC5007, San Diego, CA 92123, USA.
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Oct 2;172(1):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Jan 12.
The differentiation of SIDS from accidental or inflicted suffocation may be impossible without corroborating findings from the death scene or autopsy or in the absence of a confession from a perpetrator. Pulmonary intra-alveolar hemorrhage (PH) has been proposed as a potential clue to suffocation, but none of the previous studies on this topic have limited SIDS cases to those who were in a safe sleep environment, in which all were found supine and alone on a firm surface with their heads uncovered. Our aims are to: (1) compare PH in SIDS cases found in a safe sleep environment to a control group comprised of infants whose deaths were attributed to accidental or inflicted suffocation and (2) assess the effect of age, CPR, and postmortem interval (PMI), with regard to the severity of PH in this subset of safe-sleeping SIDS cases. We conducted a retrospective study of all postneonatal cases accessioned by the Office of the Medical Examiner in San Diego County, California who died of SIDS or suffocation between 1999 and 2004. A total of 74 cases of sudden infant death caused by SIDS (34 cases as defined above, comprising 8% of the total SIDS cases), accidental suffocation (37), and inflicted suffocation (3) from the San Diego SIDS/SUDC Research Project database were compared using a semiquantitative measure of pulmonary intra-alveolar hemorrhage. The most severe (grade 3 or 4) PH occurred in 35% of deaths attributed to suffocation, but in only 9% of the SIDS cases. Age, duration of CPR attempts and PMI had no effect on the severity of PH in SIDS. Our results indicate that the severity of PH cannot be used independently to differentiate SIDS from suffocation deaths. Each case must be evaluated on its own merits after thorough review of the medical history, circumstances of death, and postmortem findings.
如果没有来自死亡现场或尸检的确证结果,或者没有犯罪者的供认,就可能无法将婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)与意外或故意窒息区分开来。肺肺泡内出血(PH)已被提出作为窒息的一个潜在线索,但此前关于该主题的研究均未将SIDS病例局限于那些处于安全睡眠环境中的婴儿,即在这些环境中,所有婴儿均被发现仰卧于坚硬表面且独自睡眠,头部未覆盖。我们的目的是:(1)将在安全睡眠环境中发现的SIDS病例中的PH与由意外或故意窒息导致死亡的婴儿组成的对照组进行比较;(2)评估年龄、心肺复苏(CPR)和死后间隔时间(PMI)对这一安全睡眠的SIDS病例亚组中PH严重程度的影响。我们对加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥县法医办公室接收的1999年至2004年间死于SIDS或窒息的所有新生儿后期病例进行了一项回顾性研究。使用肺肺泡内出血的半定量测量方法,比较了圣地亚哥SIDS/不明原因婴儿猝死研究项目数据库中总共74例婴儿猝死病例,其中包括SIDS(34例,如上所定义,占SIDS病例总数的8%)、意外窒息(37例)和故意窒息(3例)。最严重(3级或4级)的PH发生在35%的窒息死亡病例中,但仅发生在9%的SIDS病例中。年龄、CPR尝试持续时间和PMI对SIDS中PH的严重程度没有影响。我们的结果表明,PH的严重程度不能独立用于区分SIDS和窒息死亡。每个病例都必须在全面审查病史、死亡情况和尸检结果后根据其自身情况进行评估。