Strand V, Cohen S, Schiff M, Weaver A, Fleischmann R, Cannon G, Fox R, Moreland L, Olsen N, Furst D, Caldwell J, Kaine J, Sharp J, Hurley F, Loew-Friedrich I
Stanford University, Calif, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 1999 Nov 22;159(21):2542-50. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.21.2542.
Leflunomide is a reversible inhibitor of de novo pyrimidine synthesis shown to be effective in a phase 2 trial in 402 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
To compare the efficacy and safety of leflunomide treatment with placebo and methotrexate treatment in patients with active RA.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo, and active-controlled 12-month study.
Forty-seven university and private rheumatology practices in the United States and Canada.
Diagnosis of RA by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for duration of 6 months or longer and no previous methotrexate treatment.
Leflunomide treatment (20 mg/d), placebo, or methotrexate treatment (7.5-15 mg/wk).
American College of Rheumatology success rate (completed 52 weeks of treatment and met the ACR > or = 20% response criteria), disease progression as assessed by x-ray films, and improvement in function and health-related quality of life using the intent-to-treat population.
The 482 patients studied were predominantly women (mean age, 54 years; mean disease duration, 6.7 years) for whom a mean of 0.8 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs had failed. The ACR response and success rates for patients receiving leflunomide treatment (52% and 41%, respectively) and methotrexate treatment (46% and 35%, respectively) were significantly higher than those for patients receiving placebo (26% and 19%, respectively) (P<.001), and they were statistically equivalent, with mean time to initial response at 8.4 weeks for patients receiving leflunomide vs 9.5 weeks for patients receiving methotrexate therapy. X-ray analyses demonstrated less disease progression with leflunomide (P=.001) and methotrexate (P = .02) therapy than with placebo. Leflunomide and methotrexate treatment improved measures of physical function and health-related quality of life significantly more than placebo (P<.001 and P<.05, respectively). Common adverse events for patients receiving leflunomide treatment included gastrointestinal complaints, skin rash, and reversible alopecia. Asymptomatic transaminase elevations resulted in treatment discontinuations for 7.1% of patients receiving leflunomide therapy, 1.7% of patients receiving placebo, and 3.3% of patients receiving methotrexate therapy.
Clinical responses following administration of leflunomide, a new therapeutic agent for the treatment of RA, were statistically superior to those with placebo and equivalent to those with methotrexate treatment. Both active treatments improved signs and symptoms of active RA, delayed disease progression as demonstrated by x-ray films, and improved function and health-related quality of life.
来氟米特是一种嘧啶从头合成的可逆抑制剂,在一项针对402例活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的2期试验中显示有效。
比较来氟米特治疗与安慰剂及甲氨蝶呤治疗对活动性RA患者的疗效和安全性。
随机、双盲、安慰剂对照和活性药物对照的12个月研究。
美国和加拿大的47家大学及私立风湿病诊疗机构。
根据美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准诊断为RA,病程6个月或更长,且既往未接受过甲氨蝶呤治疗。
来氟米特治疗(20mg/天)、安慰剂或甲氨蝶呤治疗(7.5 - 15mg/周)。
美国风湿病学会成功率(完成52周治疗且达到ACR≥20%反应标准)、通过X线片评估的疾病进展,以及使用意向性治疗人群评估的功能改善和健康相关生活质量。
研究的482例患者主要为女性(平均年龄54岁;平均病程6.7年),平均0.8种改善病情抗风湿药物治疗失败。接受来氟米特治疗的患者(分别为52%和41%)及甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者(分别为46%和35%)的ACR反应率和成功率显著高于接受安慰剂的患者(分别为26%和19%)(P<0.001),且在统计学上相当,接受来氟米特治疗的患者初始反应的平均时间为8.4周,接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者为9.5周。X线分析显示,与安慰剂相比,来氟米特(P = 0.001)和甲氨蝶呤(P = 0.02)治疗的疾病进展较少。来氟米特和甲氨蝶呤治疗在身体功能和健康相关生活质量方面的改善显著优于安慰剂(分别为P<0.001和P<0.05)。接受来氟米特治疗的患者常见不良事件包括胃肠道不适、皮疹和可逆性脱发。无症状转氨酶升高导致7.1%接受来氟米特治疗的患者、1.7%接受安慰剂的患者和3.3%接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者停药。
来氟米特作为一种治疗RA的新型治疗药物,给药后的临床反应在统计学上优于安慰剂,且与甲氨蝶呤治疗相当。两种活性治疗均改善了活动性RA的体征和症状,通过X线片显示延缓了疾病进展,并改善了功能和健康相关生活质量。