Golicki Dominik, Newada Maciej, Lis Joanna, Pol Kaja, Hermanowski Tomasz, Tłustochowicz Małgorzata
Department of Pharmacoeconomics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland.
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2012;122(1-2):22-32. doi: 10.20452/pamw.1131. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic disease of the connective tissue that leads to progressive joint destruction, disability, withdrawal from occupational activity, and premature death.
The aim of the paper was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide compared with placebo, methotrexate, and sulfasalazine in monotherapy of RA.
A systematic search of databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL) was performed. Only randomized blind trials were included into the analysis. The quality of the trials was assessed by the Jadad scale. A quantitative synthesis of the results was performed (meta-analysis).
The analysis included 7 trials involving 2861 patients (1432 on leflunomide, 312 on placebo, 922 on methotrexate, and 133 on sulfasalazine). Leflunomide, compared with placebo, increased the probability of the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response 2-fold (relative risk [RR], 2.02; 95% CI, 1.46-2.80) and the probability of ACR50 response 4-fold (RR, 4.36; 95% CI, 2.33-8.17), after 1 year of treatment. Efficacy of leflunomide did not differ from that of methotrexate with reference to the majority of endpoints. Leflunomide showed partial superiority over methotrexate in the percentage of patients obtaining ACR50 and ACR70 response, doctor's assessment of the disease activity, reduction in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and improvement of the quality of life (assessed with the modified health assessment questionnaire [HAQ]). Sulfasalazine showed partial superiority in the reduction of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, while leflunomide was superior to sulfasalazine the ACR20 and ACR50 clinical response, quality of life (assessed with the HAQ), doctor's and patient's assessment of the disease activity, and reduction in CRP levels.
There were no significant differences between the effects of treatment with leflunomide and methotrexate or sulfasalazine, but leflunomide monotherapy proved more effective than placebo in relieving symptoms and signs of RA.
类风湿性关节炎(RA)是一种结缔组织的慢性全身性疾病,可导致关节进行性破坏、残疾、无法从事职业活动以及过早死亡。
本文旨在评估来氟米特与安慰剂、甲氨蝶呤和柳氮磺胺吡啶单药治疗类风湿性关节炎的疗效和安全性。
对数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane CENTRAL)进行系统检索。分析仅纳入随机盲法试验。采用Jadad量表评估试验质量。对结果进行定量综合分析(荟萃分析)。
分析纳入7项试验,涉及2861例患者(1432例接受来氟米特治疗,312例接受安慰剂治疗,922例接受甲氨蝶呤治疗,133例接受柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗)。与安慰剂相比,治疗1年后,来氟米特使美国风湿病学会改善20%(ACR20)反应的概率增加2倍(相对危险度[RR],2.02;95%可信区间[CI],1.46 - 2.80),使ACR50反应的概率增加4倍(RR,4.36;95%CI,2.33 - 8.17)。在大多数终点方面,来氟米特的疗效与甲氨蝶呤无差异。在获得ACR50和ACR70反应的患者百分比、医生对疾病活动的评估、C反应蛋白(CRP)水平降低以及生活质量改善(采用改良健康评估问卷[HAQ]评估)方面,来氟米特显示出相对于甲氨蝶呤的部分优势。柳氮磺胺吡啶在降低红细胞沉降率方面显示出部分优势,而来氟米特在ACR20和ACR50临床反应、生活质量(采用HAQ评估)、医生和患者对疾病活动的评估以及CRP水平降低方面优于柳氮磺胺吡啶。
来氟米特与甲氨蝶呤或柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗效果之间无显著差异,但来氟米特单药治疗在缓解类风湿性关节炎症状和体征方面比安慰剂更有效。