Böttiger B W, Grabner C, Bauer H, Bode C, Weber T, Motsch J, Martin E
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Heart. 1999 Dec;82(6):674-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.6.674.
To test the effect of a physician staffed advanced cardiac life support (ALS) system on patient outcome following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Observational study.
Two tier basic life support (BLS) and physician staffed ALS services in the midsized urban/suburban area of Heidelberg, Germany.
All patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac aetiology between January 1992 and December 1994 and who were covered by ALS services.
Physician staffed ALS services.
Return of spontaneous circulation, hospital discharge, and one year survival, according to the Utstein style.
Of 330 000 inhabitants, 755 suffered from cardiac arrest covered by the Heidelberg ALS services. In 512 patients, cardiopulmonary resuscitation had been initiated. Of 338 patients with cardiac aetiology, return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 164 patients (49%), 48 (14%) were discharged alive, and 40 (12%) were alive one year later; most of these patients showed good neurological outcome. Thus, 4.85 patients with cardiac aetiology were saved by the ALS services and discharged alive per 100 000 inhabitants a year. Ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia was detected in 106 patients (31%), other cardiac rhythms in 40 (12%), and asystole in 192 (57%). Hospital discharge rates (and one year survival) in these subgroups were 34.0% (29.2%), 12.5% (7.5%), and 3.6% (3.1%), respectively. Discharge rates increased if cardiac arrest was witnessed (bystander, 20.0%; BLS/ALS personnel, 21.4%; non-witnessed arrest, 3.3%; p < 0.01), and if the time period between the alarm and the arrival of the ALS unit was four minutes or less (</= 4 minutes, 30.6%; 4-8 minutes, 10.4%; > 8 minutes, 8. 1%; p < 0.001). In 69 patients with bystander witnessed cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation, the discharge rate was 37.7%; 21 patients were alive after one year.
A two tier BLS and physician staffed ALS system is associated with good long term outcome of patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac aetiology in a midsized urban/suburban area. Further studies, however, are required to assess whether having a physician in the ALS unit is an independent determinant for improved long term outcome.
测试由医生参与的高级心脏生命支持(ALS)系统对院外心脏骤停患者预后的影响。
观察性研究。
德国海德堡中型城市/郊区的两级基础生命支持(BLS)和由医生参与的ALS服务。
1992年1月至1994年12月期间所有因心脏病因导致院外心脏骤停且接受ALS服务的患者。
由医生参与的ALS服务。
根据Utstein模式,自主循环恢复情况、出院情况及一年生存率。
在33万居民中,有755人发生心脏骤停并接受海德堡ALS服务。512例患者开始进行心肺复苏。在338例心脏病因患者中,164例(49%)实现自主循环恢复,48例(14%)存活出院,40例(12%)一年后仍存活;这些患者大多神经功能预后良好。因此,每年每10万居民中有4.85例因心脏病因导致心脏骤停的患者通过ALS服务存活出院。106例患者(31%)检测到室颤或室速,40例(12%)为其他心律,192例(57%)为心脏停搏。这些亚组的出院率(及一年生存率)分别为34.0%(29.2%)、12.5%(7.5%)和3.6%(3.1%)。如果心脏骤停被目击(旁观者,20.0%;BLS/ALS人员,21.4%;未被目击的骤停,3.3%;p<0.01),以及如果从报警到ALS小组到达的时间为4分钟或更短(≤4分钟,30.6%;4 - 8分钟,10.4%;>8分钟,8.1%;p<0.001),出院率会增加。在69例由旁观者目击心脏骤停且为室颤的患者中,出院率为37.7%;21例一年后仍存活。
在中型城市/郊区,两级BLS和由医生参与的ALS系统与因心脏病因导致院外心脏骤停患者的良好长期预后相关。然而,需要进一步研究以评估ALS小组中有医生是否是改善长期预后的独立决定因素。