Andreassen S, Rees S E, Kjaergaard S, Thorgaard P, Winter S M, Morgan C J, Alstrup P, Toft E
Department of Medical Informatics and Image Analysis, Aalborg University, Denmark.
Crit Care Med. 1999 Nov;27(11):2445-53. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199911000-00021.
To evaluate a model describing postoperative hypoxemia after cardiac surgery by using two variables, i.e., shunt and resistance to oxygen diffusion (Rdff).
Estimation of these two variables in normal subjects and postoperative cardiac patients.
The pulmonary function laboratory for the normal subjects and the intensive care unit for the cardiac patients.
PATIENTS/SUBJECTS: Nine postoperative cardiac patients and six healthy subjects.
Inspired oxygen fraction was varied in normal subjects and in cardiac patients 3-6 hrs after surgery. This variation occurred in four to seven steps to achieve arterial oxygen saturations in the range 0.90-1.00.
Measurements were taken of arterial oxygen saturation, cardiac output, ventilation, and end-tidal gases at each inspired oxygen fraction. These measurements gave the following estimates for the normal subjects: shunt = 3.9+/-5.4% (mean +/- SD) and Rdiff = -5+/-16 torr/(L/min) [-0.7+/-2.2 kPa/(L/min)]; for the cardiac patients: shunt = 7.7+/-1.8% and Rdiff = 212+/-230 torr/(L/min) [28.2+/-30.6 kPa/(L/min)]. The increase in Rdiff (P = .01) was sufficient to explain the observed hypoxemia in these patients. The value for shunt was not significantly increased in the patients (p = .09). The two-variable model (shunt and Rdff) gave a better prediction of arterial oxygen saturation than a model with shunt as the only variable (p = .02).
In cardiac patients requiring supplementary oxygen, the respiratory abnormality could, in our model, be best described by an increased Rdiff, not by an increased shunt value.
通过使用分流和氧弥散阻力(Rdff)这两个变量来评估描述心脏手术后低氧血症的模型。
在正常受试者和心脏术后患者中估计这两个变量。
正常受试者的肺功能实验室和心脏患者的重症监护病房。
患者/受试者:9名心脏术后患者和6名健康受试者。
在正常受试者和术后3 - 6小时的心脏患者中改变吸入氧分数。这种变化分4至7步进行,以实现动脉血氧饱和度在0.90 - 1.00范围内。
在每个吸入氧分数下测量动脉血氧饱和度、心输出量、通气和呼气末气体。这些测量得出正常受试者的以下估计值:分流 = 3.9±5.4%(平均值±标准差),Rdiff = -5±16托/(升/分钟)[-0.7±2.2千帕/(升/分钟)];心脏患者的估计值为:分流 = 7.7±1.8%,Rdiff = 212±230托/(升/分钟)[28.2±30.6千帕/(升/分钟)]。Rdiff的增加(P = 0.01)足以解释这些患者中观察到的低氧血症。患者的分流值没有显著增加(p = 0.09)。与仅以分流作为唯一变量的模型相比,双变量模型(分流和Rdff)对动脉血氧饱和度的预测更好(p = 0.02)。
在需要补充氧气的心脏患者中,在我们的模型中,呼吸异常最好用Rdiff增加来描述,而不是分流值增加。