Suppr超能文献

果蝇快速进化基因中的大量替代多态性。对全基因组DNA多态性调查的启示。

Large number of replacement polymorphisms in rapidly evolving genes of Drosophila. Implications for genome-wide surveys of DNA polymorphism.

作者信息

Schmid K J, Nigro L, Aquadro C F, Tautz D

机构信息

Zoologisches Institut, Universität München, 80333 München, Germany.

出版信息

Genetics. 1999 Dec;153(4):1717-29. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.4.1717.

Abstract

We present a survey of nucleotide polymorphism of three novel, rapidly evolving genes in populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Levels of silent polymorphism are comparable to other loci, but the number of replacement polymorphisms is higher than that in most other genes surveyed in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Tests of neutrality fail to reject neutral evolution with one exception. This concerns a gene located in a region of high recombination rate in D. simulans and in a region of low recombination rate in D. melanogaster, due to an inversion. In the latter case it shows a very low number of polymorphisms, presumably due to selective sweeps in the region. Patterns of nucleotide polymorphism suggest that most substitutions are neutral or nearly neutral and that weak (positive and purifying) selection plays a significant role in the evolution of these genes. At all three loci, purifying selection of slightly deleterious replacement mutations appears to be more efficient in D. simulans than in D. melanogaster, presumably due to different effective population sizes. Our analysis suggests that current knowledge about genome-wide patterns of nucleotide polymorphism is far from complete with respect to the types and range of nucleotide substitutions and that further analysis of differences between local populations will be required to understand the forces more completely. We note that rapidly diverging and nearly neutrally evolving genes cannot be expected only in the genome of Drosophila, but are likely to occur in large numbers also in other organisms and that their function and evolution are little understood so far.

摘要

我们展示了对黑腹果蝇和拟果蝇种群中三个新的快速进化基因的核苷酸多态性的一项调查。沉默多态性水平与其他位点相当,但替换多态性的数量高于在黑腹果蝇和拟果蝇中调查的大多数其他基因。除了一个例外,中性检验未能拒绝中性进化。这涉及到一个基因,在拟果蝇中位于高重组率区域,而在黑腹果蝇中由于一次倒位位于低重组率区域。在后一种情况下,它显示出非常低的多态性数量,大概是由于该区域的选择性清除。核苷酸多态性模式表明,大多数替换是中性或近中性的,并且弱(正向和纯化)选择在这些基因的进化中起重要作用。在所有三个位点,对轻微有害的替换突变的纯化选择在拟果蝇中似乎比在黑腹果蝇中更有效,大概是由于有效种群大小不同。我们的分析表明,就核苷酸替换的类型和范围而言,目前关于全基因组核苷酸多态性模式的知识还远不完整,并且需要进一步分析当地种群之间的差异以更全面地了解这些力量。我们注意到,快速分化和近中性进化的基因不仅在果蝇基因组中可以预期,在其他生物体中也可能大量存在,并且到目前为止它们的功能和进化还知之甚少。

相似文献

3
Neutral and non-neutral evolution of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA.
Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):741-56. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.741.
4
Nucleotide variation in the triosephosphate isomerase (Tpi) locus of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.
Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Jun;15(6):756-69. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025979.
5
Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila.
Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):261-77. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025563.
9
Evidence for adaptive evolution of the G6pd gene in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans lineages.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Aug 15;90(16):7475-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.16.7475.
10
Polymorphism and divergence at the prune locus in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Jul;11(4):666-71. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040145.

引用本文的文献

2
Demasculinization of the Anopheles gambiae X chromosome.
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 May 18;12:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-69.
3
Maximum-likelihood model averaging to profile clustering of site types across discrete linear sequences.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Jun;5(6):e1000421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000421. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
5
E(var)3-9 of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a zinc finger protein.
Genetics. 2007 Sep;177(1):167-78. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.076521. Epub 2007 Jul 29.
7
Unusual pattern of nucleotide sequence variation at the OS-E and OS-F genomic regions of Drosophila simulans.
Genetics. 2007 Apr;175(4):1923-35. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.068015. Epub 2007 Feb 4.
8
Positive selection drives the evolution of rhino, a member of the heterochromatin protein 1 family in Drosophila.
PLoS Genet. 2005 Jul;1(1):96-108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010009. Epub 2005 Jul 25.
9
Cross-species comparison of Drosophila male accessory gland protein genes.
Genetics. 2005 Sep;171(1):131-43. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.043844. Epub 2005 Jun 8.
10
An EST survey of the sugarcane transcriptome.
Theor Appl Genet. 2004 Mar;108(5):851-63. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1510-y. Epub 2003 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Microevolutionary divergence pattern of the segmentation gene hunchback in Drosophila.
Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Nov;15(11):1403-11. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025868.
3
Locating regions of differential variability in DNA and protein sequences.
Genetics. 1999 Sep;153(1):485-95. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.1.485.
5
DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis.
Bioinformatics. 1999 Feb;15(2):174-5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.2.174.
7
Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology.
Science. 1998 Dec 11;282(5396):2012-8. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5396.2012.
10
Nucleotide variation in the triosephosphate isomerase (Tpi) locus of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.
Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Jun;15(6):756-69. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025979.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验