Zeman J, Nangle D W, Sim L
Department of Psychology, University of Maine, Orono 04469-5742, USA.
J Clin Child Psychol. 1999 Dec;28(4):426-34. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP2804_1.
Examined the degree to which clinical child programs incorporate and integrate developmental theory into their training, and introduced the contributions of 6 leaders in the field to this special section. Fifty-one clinical child doctoral programs responded to the survey. Results indicate that 3 types of training programs are operating: (a) child emphasis (n = 7), which do not have a formal clinical child training program but do have a faculty member who has child research interests; (b) clinical child (n = 37), which have a group of faculty members with specific child research and clinical interests and a formalized program of study; and (c) developmental-clinical programs (n = 7), which are similar to clinical child programs but require a substantive amount of developmental psychology course work and endorse a developmental psychopathology perspective. Findings reveal that clinical child programs have become increasingly differentiated and specialized over the past 20 years, but, with the exception of developmental-clinical programs, most programs are still neglecting to incorporate developmental theory into training. This issue, as well as concerns about the future direction of clinical child doctoral training is addressed in this special section on the Importance of Incorporating Developmental Theory Into Clinical Child Training.
研究了临床儿童项目在其培训中纳入和整合发展理论的程度,并介绍了该领域6位领导者对本特刊的贡献。51个临床儿童博士项目对调查做出了回应。结果表明,存在3种类型的培训项目:(a)儿童重点项目(n = 7),这类项目没有正式的临床儿童培训项目,但有一位具有儿童研究兴趣的教员;(b)临床儿童项目(n = 37),这类项目有一群具有特定儿童研究和临床兴趣的教员以及一个正规化的学习项目;(c)发展-临床项目(n = 7),这类项目与临床儿童项目类似,但需要大量的发展心理学课程作业,并支持发展心理病理学的观点。研究结果显示,在过去20年里,临床儿童项目变得越来越分化和专业化,但除了发展-临床项目外,大多数项目仍忽视将发展理论纳入培训。在这个关于将发展理论纳入临床儿童培训的重要性的特刊中,探讨了这个问题以及对临床儿童博士培训未来方向的担忧。