Childs Ruth A, Eyde Lorraine D
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Canada.
J Pers Assess. 2002 Feb;78(1):130-44. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7801_08.
All clinical psychology doctoral programs accredited by the American Psychological Association provide training in psychological assessment. However, what the programs teach and how they teach it vary widely. So, also, do beliefs about what should be taught. In this study, program descriptive materials and course syllabi from 84 programs were analyzed. Findings highlight commonalities in basic course content and supervised practice in administering, scoring, and interpreting assessment instruments as well as differences in coverage of psychometric and other assessment-related topics and in the extent to which lectures, labs, and practica are integrated.
所有获得美国心理学会认可的临床心理学博士项目都提供心理评估方面的培训。然而,这些项目所教授的内容以及教学方式差异很大。关于应该教授什么的观点也是如此。在本研究中,分析了84个项目的项目描述材料和课程大纲。研究结果突出了基础课程内容以及在管理、评分和解释评估工具方面的督导实践中的共性,以及心理测量和其他与评估相关主题的覆盖范围差异,还有讲座、实验室和实习整合程度的差异。