• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉内支架置入术后氯吡格雷与噻氯匹定的比较。

Clopidogrel versus ticlopidine after intracoronary stent placement.

作者信息

Berger P B, Bell M R, Rihal C S, Ting H, Barsness G, Garratt K, Bellot V, Mathew V, Melby S, Hammes L, Grill D, Holmes D R

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Dec;34(7):1891-4. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00442-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00442-8
PMID:10588199
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study compared the safety and efficacy of ticlopidine with clopidogrel in patients receiving coronary stents.

BACKGROUND

Stent thrombosis is reduced when ticlopidine is administered with aspirin. Clopidogrel is similar to ticlopidine in chemical structure and function but has fewer side effects; few data are available about its use in stent patients.

METHODS

We compared 30-day event rates in 500 consecutive coronary stent patients treated with aspirin and clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose immediately prior to stent placement, and 75 mg/day for 14 days) to 827 consecutive stent patients treated with aspirin and ticlopidine (500 mg loading dose and 250 mg twice daily for 14 days).

RESULTS

Patients treated with clopidogrel had more adverse clinical characteristics including older age, more severe angina, and more frequent infarction within the prior 24 h. Nonetheless, mortality was 0.4% in clopidogrel patients versus 1.1% in ticlopidine patients; nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 0% versus 0.5%, stent thrombosis in 0.2% versus 0.7%, bypass surgery or repeat angioplasty in 0.4% versus 0.5%, and any event occurred in 0.8% versus 1.6% of patients, respectively (p = NS). Based on the observed 30-day event rate of 1.6% with ticlopidine, the statistical power of the study was 43% to detect an even rate of 0.5% with clopidogrel, and 75% to detect an event rate with of 4% with clopidogrel, with a p value of 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that clopidogrel can be safely substituted for ticlopidine in patients receiving coronary stents.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了噻氯匹定与氯吡格雷在接受冠状动脉支架置入术患者中的安全性和有效性。

背景

噻氯匹定与阿司匹林联用时可降低支架血栓形成的发生率。氯吡格雷在化学结构和功能上与噻氯匹定相似,但副作用较少;关于其在支架置入患者中的应用数据较少。

方法

我们比较了500例连续接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗的冠状动脉支架置入患者(在支架置入前立即给予300mg负荷剂量,随后14天每天给予75mg)与827例连续接受阿司匹林和噻氯匹定治疗的支架置入患者(500mg负荷剂量,每天两次,每次250mg,共14天)的30天事件发生率。

结果

接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者具有更多不良临床特征,包括年龄较大、心绞痛更严重以及在之前24小时内梗死更频繁。尽管如此,氯吡格雷组患者的死亡率为0.4%,而噻氯匹定组为1.1%;非致命性心肌梗死发生率分别为0%和0.5%,支架血栓形成发生率分别为0.2%和0.7%,搭桥手术或再次血管成形术发生率分别为0.4%和0.5%,任何事件发生率分别为0.8%和1.6%(p = 无显著性差异)。基于观察到的噻氯匹定30天事件发生率为1.6%,该研究检测氯吡格雷事件发生率为0.5%的统计效能为43%,检测氯吡格雷事件发生率为4%的统计效能为75%,p值为0.05。

结论

这些数据表明,在接受冠状动脉支架置入术的患者中,氯吡格雷可安全替代噻氯匹定。

相似文献

1
Clopidogrel versus ticlopidine after intracoronary stent placement.冠状动脉内支架置入术后氯吡格雷与噻氯匹定的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Dec;34(7):1891-4. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00442-8.
2
Clopidogrel as adjunctive antiplatelet therapy during coronary stenting.氯吡格雷作为冠状动脉支架置入术中的辅助抗血小板治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Dec;34(7):1884-90. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00443-x.
3
Effectiveness of clopidogrel and aspirin versus ticlopidine and aspirin in preventing stent thrombosis after coronary stent implantation.氯吡格雷与阿司匹林联用对比噻氯匹定与阿司匹林联用在预防冠状动脉支架植入术后支架内血栓形成方面的有效性。
Circulation. 1999 May 11;99(18):2364-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.18.2364.
4
Clopidogrel for prevention of major cardiac events after coronary stent implantation: 30-day and 6-month results in patients with smaller stents.氯吡格雷预防冠状动脉支架植入术后主要心脏事件:小支架患者30天和6个月的结果
Am Heart J. 2000 Sep;140(3):483-91. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.108825.
5
Increased long term rates of stent thrombosis and mortality in patients given clopidogrel as compared to ticlopidine following coronary stent implantation.与噻氯匹定相比,冠状动脉支架植入术后服用氯吡格雷的患者长期支架内血栓形成率和死亡率增加。
Int J Cardiol. 2005 Sep 1;103(3):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.08.061.
6
Combination therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin after coronary stenting.冠状动脉支架置入术后氯吡格雷与阿司匹林联合治疗。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000 Jul;50(3):276-9. doi: 10.1002/1522-726x(200007)50:3<276::aid-ccd2>3.0.co;2-p.
7
A randomized comparison of clopidogrel and aspirin versus ticlopidine and aspirin after the placement of coronary-artery stents.冠状动脉支架置入术后氯吡格雷与阿司匹林联用对比噻氯匹定与阿司匹林联用的随机研究
Circulation. 2000 Feb 15;101(6):590-3. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.6.590.
8
Frequency and correlates of coronary stent thrombosis in the modern era: analysis of a single center registry.当代冠状动脉支架血栓形成的发生率及相关因素:一项单中心注册研究分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Nov 6;40(9):1567-72. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02374-4.
9
A randomized comparison of clopidogrel and aspirin versus ticlopidine and aspirin after coronary stent implantation.
Am Heart J. 2004 Apr;147(4):E15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.040.
10
Thrombotic and bleeding events after coronary stenting according to clopidogrel and aspirin platelet reactivity: VerifyNow French Registry (VERIFRENCHY).根据氯吡格雷和阿司匹林血小板反应性评估冠状动脉支架置入术后的血栓形成和出血事件:VerifyNow法国注册研究(VERIFRENCHY)
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Apr;107(4):225-35. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Antiplatelet Strategies Following PCI: A Review of Trials Informing Current and Future Therapies.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的抗血小板策略:对指导当前及未来治疗的试验的综述
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Mar 6;2(3):100607. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100607. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
2
Low ADAMTS-13 in plavix induced thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.氯吡格雷诱导的血栓性血小板减少性紫癜中ADAMTS-13水平降低。
World J Clin Cases. 2013 Apr 16;1(1):31-3. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v1.i1.31.
3
Heparin in interventional radiology: a therapy in evolution.
介入放射学中的肝素:一种不断发展的疗法。
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2005 Jun;22(2):95-107. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-871864.
4
Clopidogrel: a review of its use in the prevention of thrombosis.氯吡格雷:其在预防血栓形成中的应用综述
Drugs. 2007;67(4):613-46. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767040-00013.
5
Modulating thrombotic potential in catheter-based percutaneous coronary and peripheral vascular interventions.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2004 Feb;17(1):11-20. doi: 10.1023/B:THRO.0000036024.47732.d6.
6
Multi-bed vascular disease: past, present, and future.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2004 Feb;17(1):5-9. doi: 10.1023/B:THRO.0000036023.14285.c5.
7
Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining.辩论:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG):一个不断变化的目标,但我们正在取得进展。
Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2001;2(6):263-265. doi: 10.1186/cvm-2-6-263.
8
Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in elective percutaneous coronary intervention.择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的抗血小板和抗凝治疗。
Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2001;2(3):129-140. doi: 10.1186/cvm-2-3-129.
9
Results of the Ticlid or Plavix Post-Stents (TOPPS) trial: do they justify the switch from ticlopidine to clopidogrel after coronary stent placement?噻氯匹定或氯吡格雷冠状动脉支架置入术后(TOPPS)试验结果:这些结果是否足以证明冠状动脉支架置入术后从噻氯匹定转换为氯吡格雷是合理的?
Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2000;1(2):83-87. doi: 10.1186/cvm-1-2-083.
10
Aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease: is it simply irresistible?阿司匹林用于冠状动脉疾病患者:它是否仅仅是不可抗拒的?
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2001 Apr;11(2):117-26. doi: 10.1023/a:1011220615447.