Zito J M, Safer D J, dosReis S, Magder L S, Gardner J F, Zarin D A
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Dec;153(12):1257-63. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.12.1257.
(1) To describe temporal patterns of office visits for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and stimulant treatment for 5- to 14-year-old US youths; (2) to compare youth visits for ADHD with and without melication according to patient demographics, physician specialty, reimbursement source, and comorbid diagnoses; and (3) to compare office visits for youths with ADHD in relation to common medication patterns (stimulants alone, stimulants with other psychotherapeutic medication, and nonstimulant psychotherapeutic medications alone).
Survey based on a national probability sample of office-based physicians in the United States.
Physician offices.
A systematically sampled group of office-based physicians.
National estimates of office visits for ADHD and psychotherapeutic drug visits for ADHD for each year and for a combined 8-year period.
Youth visits for ADHD as a percentage of total physician visits had a 90% increase, from 1.9% in 1989 to 3.6% in 1996. Stimulant therapy within ADHD youth visits rose from 62.6% in 1989 to 76.6% in 1996. While the majority of non-ADHD youth visits were conducted by primary care physicians, one third of ADHD youth visits were managed by psychiatry and neurology specialists. Health maintenance organization insurance was the reimbursement source for 17.9% of non-ADHD youth visits but only 11.7% of ADHD youth visits. Complex medication therapy was more likely to be prescribed by psychiatrists and less likely to be related to visits with health maintenance organization reimbursement.
National survey estimates in the 1990s confirm the substantial increase in visits for youths diagnosed as having ADHD, with more than three quarters of these visits associated with psychotherapeutic medication treatment. Physician specialty and reimbursement source variables identify distinct patient populations with a gradient in psychotherapeutic medication patterns from single-drug standard (stimulant) therapy to complex multidrug treatment regimens for which evidence-based scientific information is lacking.
(1)描述美国5至14岁青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)门诊就诊及兴奋剂治疗的时间模式;(2)根据患者人口统计学特征、医生专业、报销来源和共病诊断,比较接受和未接受药物治疗的ADHD青少年就诊情况;(3)比较ADHD青少年门诊就诊与常见药物治疗模式(仅使用兴奋剂、使用兴奋剂与其他心理治疗药物、仅使用非兴奋剂心理治疗药物)的关系。
基于美国门诊医生全国概率样本的调查。
医生办公室。
一组系统抽样的门诊医生。
每年及8年综合期间ADHD门诊就诊和ADHD心理治疗药物就诊的全国估计数。
ADHD青少年就诊占医生总就诊的百分比增加了90%,从1989年的1.9%增至1996年的3.6%。ADHD青少年就诊中兴奋剂治疗的比例从1989年的62.6%升至1996年的76.6%。虽然大多数非ADHD青少年就诊由初级保健医生进行,但三分之一的ADHD青少年就诊由精神病学和神经学专家管理。健康维护组织保险是17.9%的非ADHD青少年就诊的报销来源,但仅是11.7%的ADHD青少年就诊的报销来源。复杂药物治疗更可能由精神科医生开出处方,且与健康维护组织报销的就诊关系较小。
20世纪90年代的全国调查估计证实,被诊断为ADHD的青少年就诊大幅增加,其中超过四分之三的就诊与心理治疗药物治疗有关。医生专业和报销来源变量识别出不同的患者群体,其心理治疗药物模式从单一药物标准(兴奋剂)治疗到缺乏循证科学信息的复杂多药物治疗方案呈梯度变化。