Wilke J, Gramowski K H, Gobsch H
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1975;330:64-7. doi: 10.3109/00016487509121276.
At examination of normal persons, the ENG registration method was compared with that of PENG. Special examinations were executed with regard to the behaviour of the beat rates during the culmination phase of thermal labyrinth reactions by using each of both registering methods. By synchronous recording of PENG and ENG, it was possible to settle the discrepancy of the greater number of beats in ENG compared with those of PENG, while the examinations were executed at different times. The PENG-method does not exclude an optical fixation due to the necessary interior illumination, and this results in a retarding of the reaction and smaller beat rates. This fact should be considered when comparing the results of ENG and PENG.
在对正常人进行检查时,对眼震电图(ENG)记录方法与眼震近景图(PENG)记录方法进行了比较。通过使用这两种记录方法中的每一种,针对热迷路反应高峰期的心率行为进行了特殊检查。通过同步记录PENG和ENG,在不同时间进行检查时,得以解决ENG中比PENG中更多的搏动差异问题。由于必要的内部照明,PENG方法不排除视觉注视,这导致反应延迟和心率降低。在比较ENG和PENG的结果时应考虑这一事实。