Murphy S
Department of Pharmacology and the Neuroscience Program, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, USA.
Glia. 2000 Jan 1;29(1):1-13. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1136(20000101)29:1<1::aid-glia1>3.0.co;2-n.
Roles proposed for nitric oxide (NO) in CNS pathophysiology are increasingly diverse and range from intercellular signaling, through necrotic killing of cells and invading pathogens, to the involvement of NO in apoptosis and tissue remodeling. In vitro evidence and observations from experimental animal models of a variety of human neuropathologies, including stroke, indicate that glial cells can produce NO. Regulation of at least one of the NO synthase genes (NOS-2) in glia has been well described; however, apart from hints emerging out of co-culture studies and extrapolation based upon the reactivity of NO, we are a long way from identifying functions for glial-derived NO in the CNS. Although the assumption is that NO is very often cytotoxic, it is evident that NO production does not always equate with tissue damage, and that both the cellular source of NO and the timing of NO production are important factors in terms of its effects. With the development of strategies to transfer or manipulate expression of the NOS genes in specific cells in situ, the ability to deliver NO into the CNS via long-lived chemical donors, and the emergence of more selective NOS inhibitors, an appreciation of the significance of glial-derived NO will change.
一氧化氮(NO)在中枢神经系统病理生理学中所起的作用越来越多样化,范围从细胞间信号传导,到细胞和入侵病原体的坏死性杀伤,再到NO参与细胞凋亡和组织重塑。包括中风在内的各种人类神经病理学的体外证据和实验动物模型的观察结果表明,胶质细胞可以产生NO。胶质细胞中至少一种一氧化氮合酶基因(NOS-2)的调节已得到充分描述;然而,除了共培养研究中出现的线索以及基于NO反应性的推断之外,我们距离确定中枢神经系统中胶质细胞衍生的NO的功能还有很长的路要走。尽管通常认为NO具有细胞毒性,但很明显,NO的产生并不总是等同于组织损伤,而且NO的细胞来源和产生时间都是影响其作用的重要因素。随着原位转移或操纵特定细胞中NOS基因表达的策略的发展、通过长效化学供体将NO递送至中枢神经系统的能力以及更具选择性的NOS抑制剂的出现,对胶质细胞衍生的NO的重要性的认识将会改变。