Tay S Y, Thoo F L, Sitoh Y Y, Seow E, Wong H P
Department of Emergency Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital Singapore, Singapore.
J Emerg Med. 1999 Nov-Dec;17(6):945-7. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(99)00120-1.
This was a study to determine if the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) for requesting x-ray studies in twisting ankle and foot injuries are applicable in our Asian population. Four hundred ninety-four consecutive eligible patients presenting to the emergency department with twisting injuries about the ankle were examined by emergency physicians for clinical criteria requiring ankle and foot x-ray studies according to the OAR. Four hundred eighty-eight of these patients underwent x-ray studies that were interpreted by a radiologist. The sensitivity and specificity of the OAR for predicting the presence of fracture were calculated to be 0.9 and 0.34, respectively. When the rules were modified to cast a wider screening net, sensitivity improved to 0.99. We conclude that the OAR are not applicable to our population because of inadequate sensitivity, but when modified become acceptable and can reduce the number of x-ray studies requested by 28%.
这是一项旨在确定用于踝关节和足部扭伤时要求进行X线检查的渥太华踝关节规则(OAR)是否适用于我们亚洲人群的研究。494例连续因踝关节扭伤而到急诊科就诊的符合条件的患者,由急诊医生根据OAR检查是否存在需要进行踝关节和足部X线检查的临床标准。其中488例患者接受了X线检查,由放射科医生进行解读。OAR预测骨折存在的敏感性和特异性分别计算为0.9和0.34。当规则修改以扩大筛查范围时,敏感性提高到0.99。我们得出结论,由于敏感性不足,OAR不适用于我们的人群,但修改后变得可以接受,并且可以减少28%的X线检查申请数量。