Ross R S, Viazov S, Renzing-Köhler K, Roggendorf M
Institute of Virology, National Reference Centre for Hepatitis C, University of Essen, Essen, Germany.
J Med Virol. 2000 Feb;60(2):122-5.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) subtype distribution was studied in 395 chronically infected patients from Germany. HCV genotype 1 was most frequent (80.5%). One hundred forty-three individuals (36.2%) were infected with subtype 1a and 175 (44.3%) were suffering from subtype 1b infection, respectively. HCV subtype 3a was found in 53 (13.42%) persons. Subtypes 2a, 2b, and 2c have been detected in 5 (1.27%), 10 (2.53%), and 4 (1.01%) individuals. Genotypes 4 and 5a accounted for HCV infections in 4 (1.01%) and 1 (0.25%) subjects. There was a notable variation in the distribution of the prevalent subtypes 1a and 1b in different age groups. Subtype 1a was detected in 53.3% and 68.0% of patients aged 1-10 and 11-20 years, whereas subtype 1b in the same groups was present only in 33.3% and 28.0% of patients, respectively. In contrast, in individuals older than 50 years subtype 1b was most frequent. Thus, subtype 1b has been gradually substituted for subtype 1a during the last 20 years. Logistic regression analysis with adjustment for sex and different modes of HCV acquisition demonstrated that age of the infected subjects was a direct explanatory variable for subtype 1a and 1b distribution. Therefore, the observed shift in HCV subtype prevalence could not be attributed to changes in the epidemiological relevance of different known risk factors of HCV transmission, as had been assumed in previous studies. The altered subtype pattern reported here may have a profound influence on the future epidemiology of HCV infection.
对来自德国的395例慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染患者的HCV亚型分布情况进行了研究。HCV基因1型最为常见(80.5%)。分别有143例个体(36.2%)感染1a亚型,175例个体(44.3%)感染1b亚型。53例(13.42%)患者检测出HCV 3a亚型。5例(1.27%)、10例(2.53%)和4例(1.01%)个体分别检测出2a、2b和2c亚型。4例(1.01%)和1例(0.25%)受试者的HCV感染由基因4型和5a型引起。在不同年龄组中,流行的1a和1b亚型分布存在显著差异。在1至10岁和11至20岁的患者中,分别有53.3%和68.0%检测出1a亚型,而同一组中1b亚型仅分别占患者的33.3%和28.0%。相反,在50岁以上的个体中,1b亚型最为常见。因此,在过去20年中,1b亚型已逐渐取代1a亚型。对性别和不同HCV感染途径进行校正后的逻辑回归分析表明,受感染受试者的年龄是1a和1b亚型分布的直接解释变量。因此,观察到的HCV亚型流行率变化不能归因于不同已知HCV传播危险因素的流行病学相关性变化,正如先前研究所假设的那样。此处报告的亚型模式改变可能对HCV感染的未来流行病学产生深远影响。