Depraetere S, Van Kerschaever E, Van Vlierberghe H, Elewaut A, Brouwer J T, Niesters H G, Schalm S W, Maertens G, Leroux-Roels G
Center for Vaccinology, University of Ghent, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
J Med Virol. 2000 Feb;60(2):126-32.
Interferon (IFN) alfa has been used widely for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections but only a small number of patients treated have shown a sustained biochemical and virological response. Anti-envelope E1 and E2 antibody titers were assessed retrospectively before, during, and after treatment with IFN in order to evaluate their usefulness for the prediction and monitoring of therapy outcome in 115 patients infected chronically with HCV genotype 1b. At baseline, E2 induced more frequent and stronger immunogenic responses than E1, irrespective of patient response to therapy. E1 and E2 antibodies also tended to be higher in patients with a long-term or a transient response to IFN treatment than in patients who were absolute non-responders. In most patients, E1 and E2 antibody levels tended to be lower after treatment. This reduction was most pronounced and occurred most frequently in long-term responders to therapy. In this patient group, the reduction of E1 antibodies was more pronounced than that of E2 antibodies. In contrast to E2 antibodies, the decrease of E1 antibodies could already be observed at the end of therapy (week 24) and was significantly larger (p<0.05) than that observed in relapsers and non-responders. Thus, a sustained elevation of E1 antibodies seems to be associated with ongoing infection even when HCV RNA levels were undetectable in serum. Monitoring of E1 antibody titers may represent a useful additional marker to discriminate sustained responders from those who relapse in patients receiving interferon therapy.
干扰素(IFN)α已被广泛用于治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染,但接受治疗的患者中只有少数显示出持续的生化和病毒学应答。为了评估抗包膜E1和E2抗体滴度在预测和监测115例慢性感染HCV 1b基因型患者治疗结果中的作用,对其在IFN治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后的水平进行了回顾性评估。在基线时,无论患者对治疗的反应如何,E2诱导的免疫原性反应比E1更频繁、更强。与绝对无应答者相比,对IFN治疗有长期或短暂应答的患者中E1和E2抗体水平也往往更高。在大多数患者中,治疗后E1和E2抗体水平往往会降低。这种降低在长期治疗应答者中最为明显且最常出现。在该患者组中,E1抗体的降低比E2抗体更明显。与E2抗体不同,E1抗体的降低在治疗结束时(第24周)就已可观察到,且比复发者和无应答者中观察到的降低幅度显著更大(p<0.05)。因此,即使血清中HCV RNA水平不可检测,E1抗体的持续升高似乎也与持续感染有关。监测E1抗体滴度可能是区分接受干扰素治疗患者中持续应答者和复发者的一个有用的额外标志物。