Hoffmann W, Schwarz U, Ruoff M, Georgieff M, Geldner G
Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie, Universität Ulm.
Anaesthesiol Reanim. 1999;24(5):130-3.
Compared to atracurium, cisatracurium releases less laudanosine and histamine, but it has a longer onset time. The primary objective of this study was a blinded, randomized comparison of intubation scores and onset times of a threefold ED 95 of cisatracurium using the priming technique with two priming substances cisatracurium itself and pancuronium. To test the effect of priming with cisatracurium or pancuronium on the onset of cisatracurium, 45 patients were anaesthetised with 0.15-0.25 mg/kg alfentanil, 0.25-0.3 mg/kg edomidate i.v. and O2/N2O, and were randomisely divided into one of three groups. After induction, 15 patients were primed with sodium chloride and thereafter received 0.15 mg/kg cisatracurium, 15 patients were primed with 0.01 mg/kg cisatracurium, another 15 patients were primed with 0.015 mg/kg pancuronium and the last two groups received 0.14 mg/kg cisatracurium three minutes later. Neuromuscular response was monitored by adductor pollicis electromyogram (EMG) by stimulating in a TOF pattern. Times for T1 reduction to 75%, 50%, 25% and 0% and T1 recovery to 25% were taken. Intubation was performed 120 seconds after the main relaxant dose and scored in four grades. The two priming groups showed a significantly faster onset of neuromuscular blockade than the control group (cisatracurium priming group: T1 = 0: 178.4 +/- 16.3 sec., pancuronium priming group 171.2 +/- 15.3 sec. vs. control group: T1 = 0: 205.5 +/- 18.9 sec.). Both primed groups showed no significantly better intubation scores, compared with the control group. Using the priming principle, cisatracurium will give good intubation scores 120 seconds after injection with a clinical duration profile comparable to an equipotent dose of atracurium.
与阿曲库铵相比,顺式阿曲库铵释放的劳丹诺辛和组胺较少,但起效时间较长。本研究的主要目的是采用预注技术,对使用两种预注药物(顺式阿曲库铵自身和潘库溴铵)的三倍ED95顺式阿曲库铵的插管评分和起效时间进行双盲、随机比较。为了测试用顺式阿曲库铵或潘库溴铵预注对顺式阿曲库铵起效的影响,45例患者用0.15 - 0.25mg/kg阿芬太尼、0.25 - 0.3mg/kg依托咪酯静脉注射以及氧气/氧化亚氮进行麻醉,并随机分为三组之一。诱导后,15例患者用氯化钠预注,随后接受0.15mg/kg顺式阿曲库铵,15例患者用0.01mg/kg顺式阿曲库铵预注,另外15例患者用0.015mg/kg潘库溴铵预注,最后两组在三分钟后接受0.14mg/kg顺式阿曲库铵。通过拇内收肌肌电图(EMG)以四个成串刺激(TOF)模式进行刺激来监测神经肌肉反应。记录T1降低到75%、50%、25%和0%以及T1恢复到25%的时间。在给予主要松弛剂剂量120秒后进行插管,并按四个等级评分。两个预注组的神经肌肉阻滞起效明显快于对照组(顺式阿曲库铵预注组:T1 = 0:178.4 +/- 16.3秒,潘库溴铵预注组171.2 +/- 15.3秒,对照组:T1 = 0:205.5 +/- 18.9秒)。与对照组相比,两个预注组的插管评分均无明显更好。采用预注原则,顺式阿曲库铵在注射120秒后将给出良好的插管评分,其临床持续时间曲线与等效剂量的阿曲库铵相当。